Closed
Bug 146904
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
Stylesheet loads only if returned with HTTP header "Content-type: text/css"
Categories
(Tech Evangelism Graveyard :: English US, defect)
Tech Evangelism Graveyard
English US
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: bugzilla, Assigned: doronr)
References
()
Details
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.0rc2)
Gecko/20020510
BuildID: 2002051005
When a Web page with a CSS stylesheet is requested from a server, Mozilla only
seems to parse the stylesheet if the server's "Content-type" HTTP Response
Header is set to "text/css".
This definitely seems like behavior to be appreciated, but it causes a number of
previously functioning sites (on misconfigured servers) to loose their visual
formatting in Mozilla (and Netscape 6).
What follows here is a partial transcript of an HTTP session where I confirmed
the "Content-type" header field for the CSS file is incorrect:
------------------------------
Trying 207.115.185.170...
Connected to www.bodhiyoga.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
GET /bodhiStyles.css HTTP/1.1
Host: bodhiyoga.com
HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 21:39:28 GMT
Server: WebSitePro/2.4.9
Accept-ranges: bytes
Content-type: application/octet-stream
Last-modified: Fri, 24 May 2002 21:16:36 GMT
Content-length: 4606
------------------------------
As you can see, the server is responding by sending the CSS file as
"Content-type: application/octet-stream" instead of the correct "Content-type:
text/css". This causes Mozilla ignore the file, because it does not think it is
receiving CSS!
All my other Web browsers (IE5, iCab, Opera) still parse the CSS stylesheet on
sites like this!
Could the Content-type checking be loosened up to allow the sites on these
misconfigured servers to function normally again?
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. go to http://www.bodhiyoga.com/ in a non-Mozilla, CSS-compliant browser
(perhaps IE5)
2. go to the same site in Mozilla
3. compare the two -- notice the complete lack of formatting in the
Mozilla-rendered version of the page!
Actual Results: Mozilla did not load the CSS stylesheet
Expected Results: Mozilla should have loaded and parsed the stylesheet
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
invalid
Mozilla can't render a application/octet-stream CSS files.
Mozilla just follows the standards
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
![]() |
||
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
Wow. Talk about lack of useless information...
See http://mozilla.org/releases/mozilla1.0/#devel -- this behavior only happens
on pages which are being rendered in "standards" mode. The vast majority of
pages will be unaffected.
Reopening this. We should evangelize the site.
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: INVALID → ---
![]() |
||
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
To evang.
Assignee: dbaron → doron
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: Style System → US General
Ever confirmed: true
OS: MacOS X → All
Product: Browser → Tech Evangelism
QA Contact: ian → zach
Hardware: Macintosh → All
Version: other → unspecified
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
worksforme
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago → 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
This is still an open issue...
The behaviour will no longer show up at the URL I gave as an example
(http://www.BodhiYoga.com/), because I contacted the sysop of host and notified
them of the problem. They fixed their HTTP server config, so CSS files are now
sent as "Content-type: text/css".
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: WORKSFORME → ---
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
>This is still an open issue...
Where is the problem ?
The page is fixed ! (The bug is in Tech evangelism because want to send a mail
to the webmaster to fix the page)
That mozilla ignores non text/css files is correct and will not fixed (invalid)
-> wfm again
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago → 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
My mistake...I am new to the colloquial meanings and purposes of things such as
"Tech Evangelism" here in Bugzilla...WORKSFORME makes sense :)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Product: Tech Evangelism → Tech Evangelism Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•