Closed Bug 1471642 Opened 7 years ago Closed 6 years ago

Thunderbird incorrectly wraps plaintext emails at 46 char

Categories

(MailNews Core :: Composition, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 1503662

People

(Reporter: ronjouch, Unassigned)

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

Thunderbird recently (maybe somewhere around 60.0b4 or 60.0b6) started wrapping plain text emails at 46 characters, even though my `mailnews.wraplength` is set to the default value of 72. See attached screenshot. Am I missing something? Configuration: - Thunderbird 60.0b9 (64-bit) 20180625191326 - OS: Ubuntu Linux 18.04 LTS. - Addons: CompactHeader 2.1.5, Lightning 6.2b1, Provider for Gcal 4.1b1
Component: Message Compose Window → Composition
Product: Thunderbird → MailNews Core
Looks like you're using plaintext composition. If I do that, I wrap at 72 characters. Install the add-on ThunderHTMLedit and look at the HTML of the composition. Yes, plaintext is of course also HTML ;-) I see: <body style="font-family: -moz-fixed; white-space: pre-wrap; width: 72ch;">1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 <br> And of course that wraps at 72, otherwise Gecko would be broken.
(In reply to Jorg K (GMT+2) from comment #1) > Install the add-on ThunderHTMLedit and look at the HTML of the composition. Same exact output here, see attachment.
So then paste that into a HTML document and open with FF. Where does it wrap?
(In reply to Jorg K (GMT+2) from comment #3) > paste that into a HTML document and open with FF. Where does it wrap? This HTML document wraps correctly at 72 char in FF 63.0a1_2018-06-28. However, narrowing to Gecko so fast feels expeditious to me; I'm confident too Gecko is fine, especially on such a simple use case. Something else, somewhere, causes this incorrect wrapping. Or I might be missing something utterly stupid (that's what pushed me to make a GIF, to be maximally explicit). Requests for more debug info welcome :) .

Font scaling issue? See bug 1594444 comment #2.

Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: