Closed Bug 1477064 Opened Last year Closed Last year
_DRAWING _MODEL histogram data on release
Due to bug 1296400, WebRender may break some unknown percentage of flash users. Need to get this flash render mode probe collecting on release so we can determine what percentage of users will be affected.
Moving this to the right component. Work for individual probes is usually tracked in the component that measures it.
Component: Telemetry → Plug-ins
Product: Toolkit → Core
Tracking for 62, from email discussion it sounds like we want to land something here in beta 62.
Jim are you working on this or can you help find an owner?
(In reply to Liz Henry (:lizzard) (needinfo? me) from comment #3) > Jim are you working on this or can you help find an owner? Yes I am!
Jim, we're building the final beta of Fx62 today and the RC on Monday. Is this getting close to landing?
Assignee: nobody → jmathies
Comment on attachment 9012316 [details] datarequestforplugindrawingmodelchage.html 1) Is there or will there be **documentation** that describes the schema for the ultimate data set available publicly, complete and accurate? Yes, in Histograms.json. 2) Is there a control mechanism that allows the user to turn the data collection on and off? Yes, telemetry setting. 3) If the request is for permanent data collection, is there someone who will monitor the data over time?** Presumably, Jim. 4) Using the **[category system of data types](https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Data_Collection)** on the Mozilla wiki, what collection type of data do the requested measurements fall under? ** Category 1. 5) Is the data collection request for default-on or default-off? Default ON, all channels. 6) Does the instrumentation include the addition of **any *new* identifiers** (whether anonymous or otherwise; e.g., username, random IDs, etc. See the appendix for more details)? No. 7) Is the data collection covered by the existing Firefox privacy notice? Yes. 8) Does there need to be a check-in in the future to determine whether to renew the data? No, permanent.
Attachment #9012316 - Flags: review?(francois) → review+
Comment on attachment 9012310 [details] [diff] [review] patch v.1 As far as I can see, the only change is the releaseChannelCollection field. The rest is just whitespace changes.
Attachment #9012310 - Flags: review?(francois) → review+
(In reply to François Marier [:francois] from comment #9) > Comment on attachment 9012310 [details] [diff] [review] > patch v.1 > > As far as I can see, the only change is the releaseChannelCollection field. > The rest is just whitespace changes. Yeah sorry, my editor updated the formatting. I'll clean that up before I push.
Pushed by email@example.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/7ed2dd1cac54 Collect PLUGIN_DRAWING_MODEL histogram data on release. r=francois, data=francois
Comment on attachment 9012310 [details] [diff] [review] patch v.1 Approval Request Comment [Feature/Bug causing the regression]: no regression, telemetry data collection change for 63 [User impact if declined]: dev centric request, webrender compat related. [Is this code covered by automated tests?]: yes [Has the fix been verified in Nightly?]: no [Needs manual test from QE? If yes, steps to reproduce]: no [List of other uplifts needed for the feature/fix]: none [Is the change risky?]: no [Why is the change risky/not risky?]: simple telemetry data collection change. we collected this in the past on release. [String changes made/needed]: none
Attachment #9012310 - Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Comment on attachment 9012310 [details] [diff] [review] patch v.1 Uuplift accepted for 63 beta 11, thanks.
Attachment #9012310 - Flags: approval-mozilla-beta? → approval-mozilla-beta+
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.