Bug 147715 (PluginDocOS2)

Plugin documentation for OS/2

RESOLVED WONTFIX

Status

Documentation
Help Viewer
RESOLVED WONTFIX
16 years ago
3 years ago

People

(Reporter: mkaply, Assigned: Michael Hendy (Hendikins))

Tracking

Details

(URL)

Attachments

(1 attachment, 3 obsolete attachments)

(Reporter)

Description

16 years ago
We'd like a plugin page for OS/2 as well.

We have very few plugins so it will be very easy :)

The referenced page has a lot of the intro info.
(Reporter)

Updated

16 years ago
Blocks: 104506

Comment 1

16 years ago
Are you looking for a Mozilla hosted site, or just something that looks similar
to the Linux/Mac/Win plugins pages?
(Reporter)

Comment 2

16 years ago
Just something similar to what Win/Mac/Linux have. And then it will be hosted by 
plugindoc.mozdev.org.
(Assignee)

Comment 3

16 years ago
Assigning getting it on PluginDoc to self.

Contributions via e-mail or on this bug accepted.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
(Assignee)

Comment 4

16 years ago
My bad there... sorry for spam
Assignee: rudman → nobandwidth
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
(Assignee)

Comment 5

16 years ago
Didn't I just assign this to self? (sorry for spam, again!)
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED

Comment 6

16 years ago
There was an auto-assign feature added to Bugzilla by SciTech for when you
reassign a bug to yourself - not sure if it ever got added to CVS, though.

Anyway, the attached os2.html hopefully looks correct when the style sheet is
active.  Feel free to fix up anything.

Comment 7

16 years ago
Created attachment 85395 [details]
os/2 plugins page for plugindoc
(Assignee)

Comment 8

16 years ago
I'm going to have to strip most of that stuff out, because mozdev adds the
branding automatically.

Also, I'll have to label it "Mozilla 1.0 RC3" instead of "Mozilla 1.0.x" just to
be consistant...
(Assignee)

Comment 9

16 years ago
Created attachment 85398 [details]
OS/2 PluginDoc

File to edit for future additions.
Attachment #85395 - Attachment is obsolete: true

Comment 10

16 years ago
> I'm going to have to strip most of that stuff out, because mozdev adds the
> branding automatically.

OK.

> Also, I'll have to label it "Mozilla 1.0 RC3" instead of "Mozilla 1.0.x" just to
> be consistant...

I thought it would be better to avoid that, but as long as someone maintains it...
(Assignee)

Comment 11

16 years ago
This is getting maintained, don't you worry ;)
(Assignee)

Updated

16 years ago
Alias: PluginDocOS2

Comment 12

15 years ago
This probably should have been marked fixed several months ago...
(Reporter)

Comment 13

15 years ago
doc is done.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
(Assignee)

Comment 14

15 years ago
Doc is a work in progress, so it's going to be reverted to "Assigned"
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
(Assignee)

Comment 15

15 years ago
Unless, of course, you think no plugins will ever be developed/updated for OS/2,
in which case feel free to close this bug :)
Status: REOPENED → ASSIGNED
(Reporter)

Comment 16

14 years ago
We have a major plugin update Steve, for the innotek Java plugin stuff if you
get a chance.

Comment 17

14 years ago
I guess now would also be a good time to update the plugindoc version to match
the Warpzilla page.  Michael, can you please attach the current HTML you are
using (sans the automagically added stuff), so I can update it?
(Assignee)

Comment 18

14 years ago
This would make a good time for me to cut the OS/2 page over to the new layout.
I'll have that ready for you by the end of the day (AEST).
(Assignee)

Comment 19

14 years ago
Created attachment 145737 [details]
Current PluginDoc OS/2 page using new layout

Conversion of existing page to new layout. I'm dropping the branding on the
files in the root directory when I finish updating them, but this is all you'll
need to chew on.
Attachment #85398 - Attachment is obsolete: true

Comment 20

14 years ago
Created attachment 145914 [details]
OS/2 plugindoc with lots of updates

I'm not allowed to obsolete the previous attachment; comments welcome...

Updated

14 years ago
Attachment #145914 - Attachment mime type: text/plain → text/html
(Assignee)

Comment 21

14 years ago
Comment on attachment 145737 [details]
Current PluginDoc OS/2 page using new layout

Right. I'll put this up.
Attachment #145737 - Attachment is obsolete: true
(Reporter)

Comment 22

14 years ago
What's up with the FAQ links on the page? (acrobat, JAva, etc.)

They go to nowhere.

Thanks

Comment 23

14 years ago
It looks like Mozilla helpfully changed the relative links to absolute links
when Michael saved the file from bugzilla.mozilla.org.  Should be easy to fix...
(Assignee)

Comment 24

14 years ago
Correction checked in. I think we're going to be attaching updates as text/plain
from now on...

Comment 25

11 years ago
As I am trying to kill off old OS/2 bugs, I wonder if this one, like the other plugindoc bugs for the other platforms, should stay open (indefinitely) for some reason?

Steve, do you want to update the plugindoc listing for OS/2 with the newest plugins, like GBM, unofficial Flash 7/9, something else? Or are you happy with maintaining that on your webpage? Or should this get moved to the Mozilla Wiki? If so this bug should be marked resolved.

Comment 26

11 years ago
(In reply to comment #25)
> As I am trying to kill off old OS/2 bugs, I wonder if this one, like the other
> plugindoc bugs for the other platforms, should stay open (indefinitely) for
> some reason?

I guess that is up to Hendikins.

> Steve, do you want to update the plugindoc listing for OS/2 with the newest
> plugins, like GBM, unofficial Flash 7/9, something else? Or are you happy with
> maintaining that on your webpage?

If a plugindoc update is desired, I can bring across the current info.

Comment 27

9 years ago
Hmmm... no response to the last comment, and the page now says it is unmaintained.  That's not very nice... you could at least have kept the link to the Warpzilla Tips page:
http://www.os2bbs.com/os2news/Warpzilla.html#Plugins

Comment 28

8 years ago
I agree with comment 25 there is no real scope to this bug. At some point it should be resolved and new bugs filed to track updates. Assuming you still want to use bmo to track this sort of thing.

Expecting people to respond to bug comments is not always the best way to elicit a response. I sugggest contacting hendy directly via some of the methods listed at http://plugindoc.mozdev.org/before-you-mail-hendikins.html . You can get the page source at http://www.mozdev.org/source/browse/plugindoc/www/OS2.html if you send him a diffed or updated page he should get to posting an update.
QA Contact: rudman → danielwang
(In reply to Kevin Brosnan from comment #28)
> I agree with comment 25 there is no real scope to this bug. At some point it
> should be resolved and new bugs filed to track updates. Assuming you still
> want to use bmo to track this sort of thing.

Closing as this whole "Documentation" product is not maintained anymore. Please file new bugs at better places. Of course, this can also be re-opened if you have strong concerns.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 15 years ago3 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.