Closed
Bug 1480810
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
PREF_COMPLEX is an unknown type
Categories
(Remote Protocol :: Marionette, enhancement)
Remote Protocol
Marionette
Tracking
(firefox63 fixed)
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla63
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox63 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: ato, Assigned: ato)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
1.40 KB,
patch
|
automatedtester
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
We reference PREF_COMPLEX in testing/marionette/prefs.js, but it
is now an unknown type.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
A warning appears in the console when you run xpcshell tests that
the PREF_COMPLEX type is no longer, and we should therefore remove
it from Marionette as well.
Attachment #8997466 -
Flags: review?(dburns)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
try: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=d478ff1024c08d820c67dd8eb63626f74f1005d0
Assignee: nobody → ato
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Updated•7 years ago
|
Attachment #8997466 -
Flags: review?(dburns) → review+
Pushed by atolfsen@mozilla.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/541bad93631c
Drop PREF_COMPLEX from Marionette prefs module. r=automatedtester
Comment 4•7 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
status-firefox63:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla63
Comment 5•7 years ago
|
||
So how are complex values handled those days? Please see my comment from https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1432894#c28. Please check that we don't regress something here.
Flags: needinfo?(ato)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
PREF_COMPLEX is not a variant of nsIPrefBranch, which is why we
were seeing a browser console warning.
Flags: needinfo?(ato)
Comment 7•7 years ago
|
||
That's not what I was asking. But I checked it myself now, and all the code related to get/set complex preferences was removed by bug 1414096. As such our logic in Marionette for preferences types is fine, and we don't miss that specific case.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Product: Testing → Remote Protocol
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•