Closed Bug 1490040 Opened 6 years ago Closed 5 years ago

Figure out how to store GCP instance type configurations

Categories

(Taskcluster :: Services, enhancement)

Product:
Taskcluster
Component:
Services
Type:
enhancement
Priority:
Not set
Severity:
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

Status:
RESOLVED INVALID

People

(Reporter: coop, Unassigned)

References

Details

Maybe this is a dupe of bug 1487694, but filing to be sure.

At the Android testing meeting this morning, we briefly discussed handling instance "types" in GCP. Since GCP doesn't really have predefined types, I'm not sure how we plan to handle this.

Will we expose all the instance param sliders in-tree as part of a config file, or will we pre-define some basic types ourselves?

Now that we know we can run basic workloads in GCP, I'd like to provide gbrown with a matrix of configurations so we can find the performance sweet spot, just like we did previously in packet.net. Seems like as good a time as any to figure out how we plan to expose these instance type configs.
Blocks: 1498298
No longer blocks: 1498298
Blocks: 1508791
I think this will be part of the GCP provider..
Component: Operations → AWS-Provisioner
Component: AWS-Provisioner → Services
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.