Closed Bug 1497785 Opened 3 years ago Closed 3 years ago
.54% Heap Unclassified (windows10-64) regression on push 72e7ef77480d0845ceabb5d3747a5523db6bda9d (Wed Oct 10 2018)
We have detected an awsy regression from push: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/pushloghtml?changeset=72e7ef77480d0845ceabb5d3747a5523db6bda9d As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression. Regressions: 5% Heap Unclassified windows10-64 pgo stylo 37,429,954.61 -> 39,127,824.39 Improvements: 12% Images windows10-64 pgo stylo 7,936,538.05 -> 7,021,840.48 You can find links to graphs and comparison views for each of the above tests at: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=16599 On the page above you can see an alert for each affected platform as well as a link to a graph showing the history of scores for this test. There is also a link to a treeherder page showing the jobs in a pushlog format. To learn more about the regressing test(s), please see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/AWSY/Tests
Component: General → DOM: Content Processes
Product: Testing → Core
This also happens for Linux 64bit and Windows 7.
This is an expected side-effect of increasing the process count.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 3 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
This also brought tps regressions on some of the desktop platforms: == Change summary for alert #16593 (as of Tue, 09 Oct 2018 18:07:51 GMT) == Regressions: 19% tps windows7-32 pgo e10s stylo 10.71 -> 12.77 11% tps windows7-32 opt e10s stylo 12.13 -> 13.49 7% tps linux64 opt e10s stylo 10.80 -> 11.61 7% tps linux64-qr opt e10s stylo 9.18 -> 9.80 Improvements: 13% tps windows10-64 pgo e10s stylo 11.72 -> 10.17 9% tps windows10-64 opt e10s stylo 12.44 -> 11.30 7% tps windows10-64-qr opt e10s stylo 9.58 -> 8.88 For up to date results, see: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=16593
:erahm were these also expected?
mconley, bumping to 8 content processes seems to have both regressed *and* improved the talos tps test. Is this something we want to look into further?
Flags: needinfo?(erahm) → needinfo?(mconley)
Yeah, I think I'd like to understand this. I've filed bug 1501825 for that.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.