Closed
Bug 1499109
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
Wrap extension name instead of truncating
Categories
(Toolkit :: Add-ons Manager, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
mozilla64
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr60 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox62 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox63 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox64 | --- | verified |
| firefox65 | --- | verified |
People
(Reporter: alice0775, Assigned: mstriemer)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [ux-decision-needed])
Attachments
(4 files)
There is no valid reason to truncate the label.
| Assignee | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Summary: The label of extension name is too short, and truncated despite having enough blank space → Wrap extension name instead of truncating
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
I have 17 add-ons and none of them truncate so this seems like a bit of an outlier, however wrapping is probably nicer.
What do you think Emanuela?
Flags: needinfo?(emanuela)
Updated•7 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [ux-decision-needed]
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
I discussed this with Emanuela and it would be better if the extension had a shorter name. She's checking with some other UXers if we're better off truncating in hopes of the extension shortening its name or wrapping to make it look a little better with long names.
Priority: -- → P2
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → mstriemer
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•7 years ago
|
||
Confirmed with Emanuela that wrapping is our best bet here.
Flags: needinfo?(emanuela)
Comment 5•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mark Striemer [:mstriemer] from comment #2)
> I discussed this with Emanuela and it would be better if the extension had a
> shorter name. She's checking with some other UXers if we're better off
> truncating in hopes of the extension shortening its name or wrapping to make
> it look a little better with long names.
I'd also like to add that some languages will have longer names due to language constructs. So asking of "shorter names" isn't that friendly.
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jared Wein [:jaws] (Regression Engineering Owner for 65) (please needinfo? me) from comment #5)
> (In reply to Mark Striemer [:mstriemer] from comment #2)
> > I discussed this with Emanuela and it would be better if the extension had a
> > shorter name. She's checking with some other UXers if we're better off
> > truncating in hopes of the extension shortening its name or wrapping to make
> > it look a little better with long names.
>
> I'd also like to add that some languages will have longer names due to
> language constructs. So asking of "shorter names" isn't that friendly.
There is a bigger effort here. We're working on new content guidelines and the extensions and theme manager will change even more in the future... We just needed to figure out what we're doing in this transition time :)
As someone who doesn't speak English as first language I assure you that I'll be really mindful about other languages limitation.
Pushed by mstriemer@mozilla.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/54315f38f905
Wrap extension name in about:addons r=jaws
Comment 8•7 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla64
I was able to reproduce this issue on Firefox 62.0.3(20181001155545) under Win 7 64-bit and Mac OS X 10.13.3.
This issue is verified as fixed on Firefox 65.0a1(20181022220734) and Firefox 64.0b3 (20181022150107) under Win 7 64-bit and Mac OS X 10.13.3.
Please see the attached screenshot.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•