Closed Bug 1511468 Opened 6 years ago Closed 6 years ago

Perma late beta dist/include/mozilla/dom/ContentChild.h:723:16: error: 'OnChannelReceivedMessage' marked 'override' but does not override any member functions when Gecko 65 becomes late beta around 2019-01-03

Categories

(Core :: Storage: localStorage & sessionStorage, defect)

defect
Not set
major

Tracking

()

VERIFIED FIXED
mozilla65
Tracking Status
firefox-esr60 --- unaffected
firefox63 --- unaffected
firefox64 --- unaffected
firefox65 blocking verified

People

(Reporter: aryx, Assigned: janv)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

Late beta simulation with bustage: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&resultStatus=testfailed%2Cbusted%2Cexception%2Cretry%2Cusercancel%2Crunnable&selectedJob=214933734&revision=706362284f8d0bf3a864be250c6aa887d67ae285 Failure log: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#/jobs?job_id=214933734&repo=try&lineNumber=13649 [task 2018-11-30T20:12:27.854Z] 20:12:27 INFO - virtual void OnChannelReceivedMessage(const Message& aMsg) override; [task 2018-11-30T20:12:27.855Z] 20:12:27 INFO - ^ [task 2018-11-30T20:12:27.855Z] 20:12:27 INFO - 1 error generated. [task 2018-11-30T20:12:27.855Z] 20:12:27 INFO - /builds/worker/workspace/build/src/config/rules.mk:1131: recipe for target 'SandboxBrokerPolicyFactory.o' failed [task 2018-11-30T20:12:27.856Z] 20:12:27 ERROR - make[4]: *** [SandboxBrokerPolicyFactory.o] Error 1 Bug 1286798 touched this.
Flags: needinfo?(jvarga)
I think we need to undo patch part 3 from bug 1451363.
Flags: needinfo?(jvarga)
Attached patch patchSplinter Review
Assignee: nobody → jvarga
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #9029038 - Flags: review?(nfroyd)
Comment on attachment 9029038 [details] [diff] [review] patch Review of attachment 9029038 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Just to make sure I understand, we can't #ifdef out the ContentChild::OnChannelReceivedMessage because we now need that hook for the sole benefit of Local Storage? Assuming that's correct, r=me, I guess.
Attachment #9029038 - Flags: review?(nfroyd) → review+
(In reply to Nathan Froyd [:froydnj] from comment #3) > Comment on attachment 9029038 [details] [diff] [review] > patch > > Review of attachment 9029038 [details] [diff] [review]: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Just to make sure I understand, we can't #ifdef out the > ContentChild::OnChannelReceivedMessage because we now need that hook for the > sole benefit of Local Storage? > > Assuming that's correct, r=me, I guess. Yes, that's right. Thanks for quick r+
Pushed by jvarga@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/5502cb331414 make OnChannelReceivedMessage unconditionally defined; r=froydnj
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla65
Severity: normal → major
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: