Closed Bug 152267 Opened 22 years ago Closed 22 years ago

installer needs devkit option

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: Installer, defect)

x86
All
defect
Not set
major

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: justink, Assigned: dveditz)

Details

Currently, if a developer distributes a package with mozilla dependancies as source, all users must download a src tarball from mozilla.org even if they have mozilla installed. Header files in dist/include and IDL files in dist/idl should have an option to install. (also *.libs for win32 platform) If an application is designed to be modular and extensible, then all necessary information should be available post-installation to extend that application. It is an unnecessary step to require a seperate download.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
The installer distributes a client to be used, not to be extended. Developers extend products, not users. Should mozilla.org offer a development kit smaller than an entire source tarball? Probably, but an SDK is not part of the product itself, it's a separate thing. If your source product requires Mozilla headers to compile there's nothing stopping you from including those headers with the source for your product. If you're not using frozen interfaces it doesn't really matter if the build fails when your users try to compile against newer headers or if the binaries fail when they try to run against a mismatched interface. Other folks are working on the "Mozilla Runtime Environment", and some sort of development kit is part of their plan. search www.mozilla.org
verified
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
QA Contact: bugzilla → gbush
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.