XUL trees flush at an inappropriate time.
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: emilio, Assigned: emilio)
References
Details
(Keywords: sec-moderate, Whiteboard: [post-critsmash-triage][adv-main66+])
Attachments
(2 files)
5.24 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
47 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
lizzard
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Review |
There's a bit of orange in my try push for the assertions patch for bug 1525509, because XUL trees already do insane stuff.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
That's not sound.
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
Can I have a sec rating for this? I think it's not more than sec-moderate, since it only affects XUL trees and we don't have any of that in content.
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 5•5 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9044156 [details]
Bug 1528199 - Make nsTreeColFrame::InvalidateColumns not flush. r=dholbert,TYLin
Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
Feature/Bug causing the regression
Not a regression
User impact if declined
Can't land the assertions in bug 1525509.
Is this code covered by automated tests?
Unknown
Has the fix been verified in Nightly?
Yes
Needs manual test from QE?
No
If yes, steps to reproduce
List of other uplifts needed
None
Risk to taking this patch
Low
Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky)
Straight-forward patch affecting only XUL trees that allows the assertions from bug 1525509 to hold.
String changes made/needed
none
Comment 7•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9044156 [details]
Bug 1528199 - Make nsTreeColFrame::InvalidateColumns not flush. r=dholbert,TYLin
Fix for sec-moderate issue plus we need this for bug 1525509.
OK for uplift for beta 10.
Comment 8•5 years ago
|
||
uplift |
Updated•5 years ago
|
Updated•5 years ago
|
Updated•4 years ago
|
Description
•