Reddit logo is blurry with Webrender enabled
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: WebRender, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr60 | --- | unaffected |
firefox65 | --- | unaffected |
firefox66 | --- | unaffected |
firefox67 | --- | fix-optional |
firefox68 | --- | affected |
People
(Reporter: ke5trel, Assigned: aosmond)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug, )
Details
(Keywords: regression, testcase)
Attachments
(1 file)
1.94 KB,
text/html
|
Details |
Go to https://new.reddit.com with Webrender enabled and note the main reddit logo SVG in the top left corner is blurry. Reduced test case requires an SVG in a flex element with center alignment and a top or bottom border.
Regression window:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/pushloghtml?fromchange=fdd03ab546fa01aa3705192b2445d7311d7ed997&tochange=e32dd08ec5db619b4c66dc1504a97e0abfc27a84
Regressed by Bug 1453935.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
I see bug 1526756 did not resolve this. The work not rounding in Gecko seems to help...
Updated•6 years ago
|
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
From an initial investigation it appears that this may not be easy to fix.
The display list looks like:
item: PushReferenceFrame((
reference_frame: (
kind: Transform,
transform_style: Flat,
transform: Value((1.7201834917068481, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1.7201834917068481, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.02788696438074112, 0, 0, 1)),
id: (3, (1, 13)),
),
)),
layout: (
rect: ((19.200000762939453, 35.79999923706055), (0, 0)),
clip_rect: ((19.200000762939453, 35.79999923706055), (0, 0)),
is_backface_visible: true,
tag: None,
),
item: Image((
image_key: ((4), 81),
stretch_size: (133.12533569335938, 42.43733215332031),
tile_spacing: (133.12533569335938, 42.43733215332031),
image_rendering: Auto,
alpha_type: PremultipliedAlpha,
color: (
r: 1,
g: 1,
b: 1,
a: 1,
),
)),
layout: (
rect: ((-0.5975449681282043, 0), (133.12533569335938, 42.43733215332031)),
clip_rect: ((-0.5975449681282043, 0), (133.12533569335938, 42.43733215332031)),
is_backface_visible: true,
tag: Some((6, 3)),
),
There's a lot of fractional values that need to cancel out just right for this to end up in the right spot, so it's believable that we're not getting there.
Fortunately, I don't think this is severe enough to block release.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
This will be improved by the patches in bug 1540200, but not completely up to par with non-WebRender.
This has been fixed by Bug 608812.
Description
•