Closed Bug 1542855 Opened 5 years ago Closed 5 years ago

analysis to determine if we need more powerful instances to support current pulse traffic

Categories

(Webtools :: Pulse, defect)

Product:
Webtools
Component:
Pulse
Type:
defect
Priority:
Not set
Severity:
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

Status:
RESOLVED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: kmoir, Unassigned)

References

Details

Do we need more powerful instances (increase support contract requirements) for pulse.m.o given our traffic requirements?

Blocks: 1542805

We should also investigate if there are other support mechanisms we can engage with the CloudAMPQ team besides email. The issue with the ssl cert has been open ongoing for a while with no resolution an I think we just need to get everyone on a call to resolve (see bug 1532325)

I don't think a bigger instance will help. If pulseguardian is working correctly, the load on the hosts is small. If pulseguardian fails, load increases without bound, and will eventually crash any size instance.

Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.