Closed
Bug 1543883
Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
[Growth] General Usage Breakdown Report
Categories
(Data Science :: Investigation, task)
Tracking
(data-science-status On-hold)
RESOLVED
INACTIVE
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
data-science-status | --- | On-hold |
People
(Reporter: shong, Assigned: shong)
Details
Brief description of the request:
Write a report that looks at usage contributions of "new profiles" to overall usage over a time period.
- Possible framing: Look at new profiles in 2017. How did they contribute to usage in 2018?
Broad, open ended report, but generally looking at how usage breaks down for different groups.
Link to any assets:
N/A
Is there a specific data scientist you would like or someone who has helped to triage this request:
Requested by myself for myself. I'm just doing it because it'll be useful context and possibly fun (because of pie charts).
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
data-science-status: --- → On-hold
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
More things to look at:
- What channels are multi-channelers using (mostly beta? mostly nightly? mostly ESR? )
- How many profiles do people have?
- scalar_parent_startup_profile_selection_reason: what's the distribution?
- how much are argument / CL runs?
- how many are "restarts"?
- how many use profile managers?
- do people mostly use one way? or do they have multple ways? (i.e. if they're CL runs, are they always CL runs? )
- if so, lets isolate those. does it make sense to filter them out as "bots" here? specifically, if they run like this, do they come BACK?
- for a given DAU/MAU/WAU, what's the breakdown in age of profile (using PCD or first appear)? In categories (within 30 days, 6 months, etc.)
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
closing as inactive for now, will re-open when I get more bandwidth.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → INACTIVE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•