Collect GEOLOCATION_REQUEST_GRANTED through 2019
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Geolocation, enhancement)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox66 | --- | unaffected |
firefox67 | --- | fixed |
firefox68 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: tdsmith, Assigned: tdsmith)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
47 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
pascalc
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Review |
1.75 KB,
text/plain
|
chutten
:
data-review+
|
Details |
The GEOLOCATION_REQUEST_GRANTED probe expires in the next release. We're using this probe to target a survey, as in bug 1499851; new followup work that we're discussing now will also require the probe. Since we've extended collection a few times already, let's turn collection on indefinitely to avoid future busywork.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
The GEOLOCATION_REQUEST_GRANTED probe expires in the next release.
We're using this probe to target a survey, as in bug 1499851;
new followup work that we're discussing now will also require the probe.
Since we've extended collection a few times already, let's turn collection on indefinitely
to avoid future busywork.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9058375 [details]
Data collection review
I discussed this with Megan and she preferred to have another steward look at it.
Comment 4•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9058375 [details] Data collection review Preliminary note: The only question is around a time-boxed study, but the request is for a permanent collection. Are there additional questions not captured in the request? Could we do with an expiring collection? For permanent collections it is strongly recommended that you include a regression test ensuring that the collection doesn't break. DATA COLLECTION REVIEW RESPONSE: Is there or will there be documentation that describes the schema for the ultimate data set available publicly, complete and accurate? Yes. This collection is Telemetry so is documented in its definitions file [Histograms.json](https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/tip/toolkit/components/telemetry/Histograms.json) and the [Probe Dictionary](https://telemetry.mozilla.org/probe-dictionary/). Is there a control mechanism that allows the user to turn the data collection on and off? Yes. This collection is Telemetry so can be controlled through Firefox's Preferences. If the request is for permanent data collection, is there someone who will monitor the data over time? Yes, :tdsmith is responsible. Using the category system of data types on the Mozilla wiki, what collection type of data do the requested measurements fall under? Category 2, Interaction. Is the data collection request for default-on or default-off? Default on for all channels. Does the instrumentation include the addition of any new identifiers? No. Is the data collection covered by the existing Firefox privacy notice? Yes. Does there need to be a check-in in the future to determine whether to renew the data? No. This collection is permanent. --- Result: datareview+, pending answers to preliminary notes
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•5 years ago
|
||
You're right; an expiring collection still makes sense. I updated the patch to collect until Firefox 72. Would you like a new data review request form to formalize the change?
Updated•5 years ago
|
Pushed by tismith@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/8ca248347c5b Collect GEOLOCATION_REQUEST_GRANTED through 2019 r=jdm
Comment 8•5 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9058372 [details]
Bug 1544539 - Collect GEOLOCATION_REQUEST_GRANTED through 2019 r?jdm
Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
- User impact if declined: If declined, we won't be able to run a (newly-planned followup) survey project about geolocation during the next cycle.
- Is this code covered by automated tests?: No
- Has the fix been verified in Nightly?: No
- Needs manual test from QE?: No
- If yes, steps to reproduce:
- List of other uplifts needed: None
- Risk to taking this patch: Low
- Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): Just a change to the expiry in the probe definition
- String changes made/needed: none
Comment 10•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9058372 [details]
Bug 1544539 - Collect GEOLOCATION_REQUEST_GRANTED through 2019 r?jdm
Low risk, uplift approved for 67 beta 15, thanks.
Comment 11•5 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
Description
•