Closed Bug 155003 Opened 23 years ago Closed 23 years ago

DOM Inspector doesn't show any nodes

Categories

(Other Applications :: DOM Inspector, defect)

x86
Linux
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED INVALID

People

(Reporter: mozilla, Assigned: hewitt)

References

()

Details

When the DOM Inspector is installed it doesn't show any nodes in the "DOM Nodes" view. Stylesheets and JS Objects are shown. This happens both as a sidebar and as a seperate window. The list is empty; but white, not grayed out. This happens on any page I've visited. Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020615 Debian/1.0.0-3 I have tried installing the DOM Inspector both from the RC3 XPI at http://grayrest.com/moz/evangelism/tutorials/dominspectortutorial.shtml and the Debian Package. After installing the XPI (the Debian Package was already installed) I got this error message on startup once: ************************************************** nsNativeComponentLoader: SelfRegisterDll(/usr/lib/mozilla/components/libinspector.so) Load FAILED with error: libmozz.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ************************************************** There is no libmozz.so in any package.
I think what you're seeing might be a result of using the Mozilla-built DOM Inspector with the Debian-built Mozilla. Could you try using Debian's DOM Inspector, or install the full Mozilla build? http://download.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/releases/mozilla1.0/mozilla-i686-pc-linux-gnu-1.0-sea.tar.gz
not our bug. please complain to the debian maintainers for not packaging a libmozz.so (it's mozilla's libz.so, a symlink to your distro's libz.so will work, and you should be able to suggest that if they insist on building mozilla w/ system zlib, that they *MUST* package that symlink). Please verify that the symlink works, and change the url here to a bug report which you will file in DBTS
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Yes, see package mozilla-dom-inspector (or -snapshot) for this functionality. If you insist on being able to use Mozilla DOM Inspector XPIs (or to--potentially--be able to do this with other Mozilla-based XPIs), do the following (as root) *before* installing the XPI: #ln -s /usr/lib/libz.so.1 /usr/lib/mozilla/libmozz.so libz.so from the -dev package works, and I haven't tried libz.so.2 (YMMV). After that change, by my testing, the Mozilla-packaged DOM inspector works. Right now, there are no specifications as to what XPIs may and may not expect (or what conditions mozilla packagers must meet to accept Mozilla-ready XPIs). For this reason, you should not (in my opinion) expect Mozilla-ready XPIs to work with Mozilla packages from third-party distributors. If there is a bug here, I would think it is that XPIs can overwrite files installed by other XPIs. If that is not a bug or if it should be filed elsewhere (and isn't already), I recommend resolving this bug invalid. Also, to the reporter: it would be helpful to mention what you consider expected behavior to be (refuse to install the XPI?).
um, the xpi's need to be able to overwrite, since you need to be able to use an xpi to upgrade a package/component. however this isn't what happened, the xpi installed a new component which expected a *core* component of mozilla to be present, and that component didn't work .. no harm done. I'd also like to take issue with this statement: > There is no libmozz.so in any package. a quick google search shows that there is a libmozz.so in *many* packages and that each package it's in is a *core* package of mozilla.
Andrew and Tim: I did try the Debian DOM Inspector first. Tim: expected behavior: the DOM inspector should work correctly. timeless: I meant "There is no libmozz.so in any _Debian_ package." Sorry for the confusion. Also, I have changed the URL field to reflect a bug report I filed with Debian.
vrfy bug is moved to DBTS.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Product: Core → Other Applications
QA Contact: timeless → dom-inspector
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.