Closed
Bug 155003
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
DOM Inspector doesn't show any nodes
Categories
(Other Applications :: DOM Inspector, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: mozilla, Assigned: hewitt)
References
()
Details
When the DOM Inspector is installed it doesn't show any nodes in the "DOM Nodes"
view. Stylesheets and JS Objects are shown. This happens both as a sidebar and
as a seperate window. The list is empty; but white, not grayed out. This
happens on any page I've visited.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020615 Debian/1.0.0-3
I have tried installing the DOM Inspector both from the RC3 XPI at
http://grayrest.com/moz/evangelism/tutorials/dominspectortutorial.shtml and the
Debian Package.
After installing the XPI (the Debian Package was already installed) I got this
error message on startup once:
**************************************************
nsNativeComponentLoader:
SelfRegisterDll(/usr/lib/mozilla/components/libinspector.so) Load FAILED with
error: libmozz.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
**************************************************
There is no libmozz.so in any package.
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
I think what you're seeing might be a result of using the Mozilla-built DOM
Inspector with the Debian-built Mozilla. Could you try using Debian's DOM
Inspector, or install the full Mozilla build?
http://download.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/releases/mozilla1.0/mozilla-i686-pc-linux-gnu-1.0-sea.tar.gz
not our bug. please complain to the debian maintainers for not packaging a
libmozz.so (it's mozilla's libz.so, a symlink to your distro's libz.so will
work, and you should be able to suggest that if they insist on building mozilla
w/ system zlib, that they *MUST* package that symlink).
Please verify that the symlink works, and change the url here to a bug report
which you will file in DBTS
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Yes, see package mozilla-dom-inspector (or -snapshot) for this functionality.
If you insist on being able to use Mozilla DOM Inspector XPIs (or
to--potentially--be able to do this with other Mozilla-based XPIs), do the
following (as root) *before* installing the XPI:
#ln -s /usr/lib/libz.so.1 /usr/lib/mozilla/libmozz.so
libz.so from the -dev package works, and I haven't tried libz.so.2 (YMMV).
After that change, by my testing, the Mozilla-packaged DOM inspector works.
Right now, there are no specifications as to what XPIs may and may not expect
(or what conditions mozilla packagers must meet to accept Mozilla-ready XPIs).
For this reason, you should not (in my opinion) expect Mozilla-ready XPIs to
work with Mozilla packages from third-party distributors.
If there is a bug here, I would think it is that XPIs can overwrite files
installed by other XPIs. If that is not a bug or if it should be filed
elsewhere (and isn't already), I recommend resolving this bug invalid.
Also, to the reporter: it would be helpful to mention what you consider expected
behavior to be (refuse to install the XPI?).
um, the xpi's need to be able to overwrite, since you need to be able to use an
xpi to upgrade a package/component. however this isn't what happened, the xpi
installed a new component which expected a *core* component of mozilla to be
present, and that component didn't work .. no harm done.
I'd also like to take issue with this statement:
> There is no libmozz.so in any package.
a quick google search shows that there is a libmozz.so in *many* packages and
that each package it's in is a *core* package of mozilla.
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•23 years ago
|
||
Andrew and Tim: I did try the Debian DOM Inspector first.
Tim: expected behavior: the DOM inspector should work correctly.
timeless:
I meant "There is no libmozz.so in any _Debian_ package." Sorry for the
confusion. Also, I have changed the URL field to reflect a bug report I filed
with Debian.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Core → Other Applications
Updated•18 years ago
|
QA Contact: timeless → dom-inspector
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•