This URL is an xml file invoking an xls file. It displays OK on MS Windows 2000 using build 2002061408, but does not display on Linux or Solaris with any build I have tried (2002062800 On Solaris) of Mozilla1.1a. The content of the URl is a re-implementation of a Mozilla FAQ with an alternate style sheet. On Linux or Solaris, current display does not change from the previous one (whether a blank page or other page).
"but does not display on Linux" wfm. Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1a) Gecko/20020610 (SuSE)
yep, i see this too, though it would be nice with a bit smaller testcase
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
I'm seeing this break with Win2k 20020625 so that's an 11 day gap where the regression happened.
After the checkin for bug 158457 yesterday (20021022), Mozilla correctly displays the URL as "Mozilla 1.0 Frequently Asked Questions" on Solaris 2.6 from sparc-sun-solaris-2.6 nightly build (20021023) and on FreeBSD 4.6.1 from CVS build (20021022).
This URL now displays also using Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021024 compiled with Sun Compiler v. 6u2. However all versions I have tried, included daily builds for Solaris, exhibit the following behavior: If the default "non-dynamic" style sheet is used, when click on a FAQ several items in the View menu are then disabled. Using the back arrow to display the original page does not enable these items. Is this normal behavior?
oops, after going to a fragment, the View->Use Style menu gets disabled. http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/xpfe/browser/resources/content/navigatorOverlay.xul#261 obviously thinks we're an image document. Looking into lxr says that someone in http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/xpfe/browser/resources/content/nsBrowserStatusHandler.js#282 or #331 said so. Both ask http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/xpfe/browser/resources/content/nsBrowserStatusHandler.js#170 Note that the page info dialog reports an unkown mimetype, maybe we failed to set that in the result doc? Jonas? Quirks isn't set either.
can anyone still reproduce this? It works for me
hrm. I left this open to check for the fragment/view/mime thing. testing on 1.3b windows, the view menu is fine, but going to a fragment from the index seems to be broken. New bug on same page?
Ouch, that's bad, but please file a new bug for that (I might have an idea what the problem is). This one is confuesed as it is. Resolving as fixed as comment 4 indicates that this was related to <script> locking things up
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
filed bug 196026
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.