Closed
Bug 155163
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
Top of page shows gaps between header/navbar
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
Future
People
(Reporter: indnsfan41, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: testcase)
Attachments
(2 files)
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1a+) Gecko/20020628 BuildID: 2002062808 At http://www.lyrics.co.nz/ The top bar/nav bar show load with out any gaps inbetween each other, but there is one under home, under links, and to the left side of the banner ad. Works on IE working on the testcae... Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. goto http://www.lyrics.co.nz/ Actual Results: top doesnt look right Expected Results: it should of added gaps where it does working on testcase
JS console on mozilla gives following error message: Error: DisplayAds is not defined Source File: http://www.lyrics.co.nz/ Line: 76 Even IE 6 gives Line: 75 Error: Object expected Possibly Evangelism?
would the javascipt error affect the page layout? it doesnt in IE, but it does in mozilla
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
I see the problem, and from looking at the Page Source, the gaps seem to correspond with the </map><map> sequence. Win98SE build 2002070104-TRUNK
Updated•22 years ago
|
QA Contact: petersen → moied
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
Mozilla, Opera6 and NN4.7 display the gap. It looks like IE has a quirk for <iframe>space<img>
Updated•22 years ago
|
Severity: normal → minor
Updated•22 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
http://www.webmd.com has a gap in the "WebMD Health" button. This is actually two graphics with Table definitions around them. Is this the same problem, or should I file a seperate bug?
switched to phoenix, no longer see this problem, no longer have mozilla to confirm
Assignee: attinasi → other
QA Contact: moied → ian
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
I still see the gap under "Home" with WinXP with Mozilla build 2002122404 TRUNK.
Comment 9•21 years ago
|
||
Yep, the "<iframe> <img>" thing is what it's about -- if I remove that space then Mozilla and IE render identically... I'd recomment WONTFIX -- I don't think adding a quirk for this is worth it.
Comment 10•21 years ago
|
||
Well, the original URL seems to have been redesigned, and no longer has the problem (they don't use iframes anymore), and my example is a differant problem. So, I'm going to mark this as WORKSFORME. BZ: I'm ignoring the underlying issue in this resolution, however, if it isn't a common problem then it's a bit less harsh than WONTFIX.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Comment 11•21 years ago
|
||
Reopening. No matter what the original URL does, we have a testcase that shows a problem. So this is not worksforme in any way, shape, or form. Nothing wrong with being harsh, so I still think we should WONTFIX, but would like to hear David's and/or Robert's opinion.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: WORKSFORME → ---
Comment 12•21 years ago
|
||
I vote WONTFIX. There is a space between those elements. Why on earth would we render them flush. I don't understand IE's rendering at all.
Comment 13•18 years ago
|
||
Boris & Hixie both agree this should be WONTFIX. Would someone with privileges update the status please?
Updated•18 years ago
|
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago → 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•