Latest CSS changes on BMO make text too small and there is not enough contrast any more
Categories
(bugzilla.mozilla.org :: General, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: jorgk-bmo, Unassigned)
Details
(Keywords: access, regression)
Attachments
(2 files)
Can you please revert some of the CSS changes that became active today.
The text is now medium grey on light grey and too small.
I spend all day messing with bugs and I have trouble reading the comments now.
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
The comment text is dark grey on white background. Also the font size is bigger than before. Are you perhaps using a user style or something?
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
or maybe legacy non-modal UI?
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
The non-comment text is now 9px high.
Comment 4•5 years ago
|
||
The non-comment text is actually 13px, which is unchanged.
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•5 years ago
|
||
What's wrong with black text? There is non-comment text, grey on grey. From my prefs: Use modal user interface: On. No user style, well, not that I'm aware of.
I'm on FF 60 ESR on Windows.
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Kohei Yoshino [:kohei] (Bugzilla UX) (FxSiteCompat) from comment #4)
The non-comment text is actually 13px, which is unchanged.
Check my picture, it's most certainly now 13px.
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•5 years ago
|
||
OK, I might be wrong with the 9px, the "P" in "Version: Production" is 9px high, measured on the screen with a magnifier. Looks like letters "i" and "h" are taller. The "T" in "This bug is currently not tracked" is 9px high, the "h" is 10 px high. Maybe it's also an effect the changed font.
Comment 8•5 years ago
|
||
This is what I see. Looks like the contrast is your monitor’s issue?
I can confirm the problems.
- Everything got less contrast: various shades of grey (background/buttons/headings/comments). If comments are white, it is not clear.
- Too much padding everywhere, comments, textarea, buttons. It is seens that now the buttons do not align vertically with the labels (they do not fit on a line), e.g. see "Assignee: Unassigned [Take]"
- rounded buttons, but that is a matter of taste. But those buttons do not look like buttons, they are just flat slabs of color, they look more like toggles (depressed) or something (if there would be more of them alongside, some of them pressed some not).
Actually the comment text did really enlarge for me.
All this on Chrome, Linux.
Comment 10•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Kohei Yoshino [:kohei] (Bugzilla UX) (FxSiteCompat) from comment #8)
Created attachment 9066098 [details]
screenshot
This is what I see. Looks like the contrast is your monitor’s issue?
I see this same. And yes, this is the low contrast we are talking about.
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Kohei Yoshino [:kohei] (Bugzilla UX) (FxSiteCompat) from comment #8)
This is what I see. Looks like the contrast is your monitor’s issue?
It worked fine this morning, in fact, a few hours ago. The "W" in "Whiteboard" on your screenshot is also 9px high, at least when I view the details.
Sadly I don't have a screenshot of the old BMO to compare.
Comment 12•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to :aceman from comment #10)
(In reply to Kohei Yoshino [:kohei] (Bugzilla UX) (FxSiteCompat) from comment #8)
Created attachment 9066098 [details]
screenshot
This is what I see. Looks like the contrast is your monitor’s issue?I see this same. And yes, this is the low contrast we are talking about.
Forgot to say: the actual text looks darker than this screenshot. It's #3c3d3e
on #fafbfc
so I don’t see any contrast issue.
Comment 13•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jorg K (GMT+2) from comment #11)
It worked fine this morning, in fact, a few hours ago. The "W" in "Whiteboard" on your screenshot is also 9px high, at least when I view the details.
As I said it’s 13px and the same as before. Maybe it looks smaller now because the comment font size is larger than before.
Re: the contrast, I’ll adjust the colour a bit. Still, I doubt a monitor or rendering issue. When I pick a text colour from Jorg’s screenshot, it will be #646566
which is totally different from #3c3d3e
specified with CSS.
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•5 years ago
|
||
Very hard to pinpoint what's changed any why everything looks smaller. Were it the repository for the CSS so I can try the old version locally?
Comment 15•5 years ago
|
||
I'm using glasses and Bugzilla in 130% zoomed mode with disabled modal user interface (I prefer old one),
and for me this new text font looks kinda blurry and causes me eye strain.
Looks like without sub-pixel anti-aliasing, but only gray-scale anti-aliasing (but it's not).
Any chances to reconsidering this change, please?
And use black text font color, instead of grey shades.
Comment 16•5 years ago
|
||
I’ll merge this to Bug 1552885 and solve the issues.
Reporter | ||
Comment 17•5 years ago
|
||
Can you please still post the details of where to get the old version, see comment #14.
Comment 18•5 years ago
|
||
@kohei, previously we embedded the browser OS into the body.class
because the default font on windows was too small. This is probably that.
Reporter | ||
Comment 19•5 years ago
|
||
Comment 20•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Dylan Hardison [:dylan] (he/him) from comment #18)
@kohei, previously we embedded the browser OS into the
body.class
because the default font on windows was too small. This is probably that.
I thought that’s for the monospace font.
Reporter | ||
Comment 21•5 years ago
|
||
Some monospace posts are tiny, check bug 1546364 comment #2.
Comment 22•5 years ago
|
||
Setting severity to normal
.
Critical is intended for bugs which involve crashes, loss of data, and severe memory leaks.
This is an accessibility issue reported by single user, not a widespread crash.
Reporter | ||
Comment 23•5 years ago
|
||
Somehow the link to the explanation of the Severity has disappeared. Surely in the Bugzilla component, "critical" is not related to crashes. In a few hours we have collected complaints of five users, here and in bug 1552885. Not being able to read what's on the screen well any more is actually quite critical.
Description
•