Site with filters (https://www.scandinavianphoto.se/ ) takes longer to load in Fennec than in Chrome/Safari
Categories
(Core :: Graphics, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: ksenia, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: perf:pageload, Whiteboard: [geckoview:p2])
- On Firefox (66.0.5) on Android
- Go to https://www.scandinavianphoto.se/
Expected:
Site loads as fast as in Chrome
Actual:
Loading/rendering takes a long time. Also when clicking on elements it takes a long time for the site to react.
Reporter | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
70% of time is spent (on MainThread) in mozilla::gfx::FilterNodeCompositeSoftware::Render() in that Fennec profile.
Here's a GeckoView_Example profile:
https://perfht.ml/2W7jkl3
36 of 49s(!) of capture time is in FilterNodeSoftware::
https://perfht.ml/2VYoQGm
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
Looks like nested blur or drop-shadow filters. If they are CSS filters, then WebRender will make them fast. If they are SVG filters, WebRender needs SVG filter support first (bug 1409486).
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
The priority flag is not set for this bug.
:jbonisteel, could you have a look please?
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
Updated•5 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 4•5 years ago
|
||
This runs reasonably well with WebRender turned on. Does anyone think it's still worth investigating trying to improve the non-webrender version?
Updated•5 years ago
|
Updated•5 years ago
|
Updated•4 years ago
|
Updated•4 years ago
|
Updated•3 years ago
|
Description
•