From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510 BuildID: 1.0 When Working with MacOS X 10.2 (Jaguar built 6C87) the Hebrew font Preferences definitions are close for editing. This reflects the Hebrew URL's - you can't see hebrew in the right way ! Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.install Jaguar 6C87 2.install Mozilla 1.0 3.Go to the Mozilla Preferencs - fonts 4. Switch to Hebrew 5. Try to define the fonts Actual Results: The font menu is locked for editing -As a result the URL's are displaying incorrectly Expected Results: In Mac OS X 10.1.5 you can define the fonts.
By "locked for editing", do you mean disabled? This would typially mean Mozilla can't find any Hebrew fonts on your system...
WorksForMe using FizzillaCFM/2002062203 on 10.1.5. Ofer, are you sure you have Hebrew fonts installed and available on 10.2? (This is Internationalization, not BiDi.)
Assignee: mkaply → yokoyama
Component: BiDi Hebrew & Arabic → Internationalization
QA Contact: zach → ruixu
Summary: Can't define fonts for Hebrew. → Can't define fonts for Hebrew
Is this a dupe of bug 110655?
if it is not a dupe of that bug, then it is a very similar relative. bug 153296 is probably related as well.
Dear All ! The Mozilla was tested with the Jaguar native hebrew fonts (Arial Hebrew, Peninim Hebrew, Corsiva Hebrew, Lucida Grand) +Additional installed Hebrew fonts (all the Hebrew fonts are working with 10.1.5 & Mozilla) I should say that all the fonts are installed & available by the system & other Applications. It seems to me that the hebrew fonts are NOT recognized by the mozilla browser.
just wondering: both for this bug and for bug 110655 : Are the Hebrew fonts installed directly in OSX, or are they taken from classic? btw, the more I look at this bug, the more it looks like a dup of bug 110655
Summary: Can't define fonts for Hebrew → mac osx: Can't define fonts for Hebrew
The fonts are installed directly to the Mac OS X library/fonts. After reviewing bug number 110655 it seems like the same bug But the browser version is different & the system version is different
marking as dup per comment #7 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 110655 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
It sounds like dup of bug 110655 for me too. Mark as verified. You can re-open if still see the problem after that bug fixed.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.