Increase or allow to configure Sync HTTP Timeouts
Categories
(WebExtensions :: Storage, defect, P3)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: wtds.trabalho, Unassigned)
Details
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:70.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/70.0
Steps to reproduce:
- Try to sync addons
- Have problem
- Timeouts
Test timeout:
Actual results:
- Timeouts:
1563297394104 Sync.Engine.Extension-Storage ERROR Syncing @notification-sound: request failed: Error: Timeout while trying to access https://webextensions.settings.services.mozilla.com/v1/buckets/default/collections/ext-FIAFijedjg-A1punja9JgKMGqP-dEwTKC_w7ANc8qNg with {"headers":{"Accept":"application/json","Content-Type":"application/json","Authorization":"Bearer cd02678519e88d395235f8dae5f166d9fb5980676eee4b07ba9c4113c9522078"},"mode":"cors"}(resource://services-common/kinto-http-client.js:2691:5) JS Stack trace: NetworkTimeoutError@kinto-http-client.js:2691:5
Expected results:
No errors.
Increase webextensions.settings.services.mozilla.com timeout.
Why slow when not authenticated?
Can it increase server load at attack?
Why slow? To Login? If not why don't load the data after login?
Thanks!
Comment 1•6 years ago
•
|
||
Hi @Wellington Torrejais da Silva, I will set a component, if isn't the right one please fell free to change it - futher I'll suppose that we will receive some support from dev's team. Could be related to: 1566759
Thanks.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
Sync issues specific to chrome.storage are tracked in WebExtensions -> Storage (but I think the specific issue here isn't that the timeout is too low, but rather that the servers are struggling)
![]() |
||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
@Jim : possible duplicate of https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1569001 ?
Updated•6 years ago
|
Just FYI, kinto webextension service has been running stable for the past week.
The issue that started this ticket may have a less chance being reproducible. I understand this may or may not affect your decision to increase the timeout value though.
![]() |
||
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Victor Carciu from comment #3)
@Jim : possible duplicate of https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1569001 ?
Yeah, that looks right. We're working on plans to upgrade the backend. That should help.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Description
•