Closed
Bug 1571120
Opened 5 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
Using paths for the old Extension install policy doesn't work anymore on Windows
Categories
(Firefox :: Enterprise Policies, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
Firefox 70
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr60 | --- | unaffected |
firefox-esr68 | --- | verified |
firefox68 | --- | wontfix |
firefox69 | --- | verified |
firefox70 | --- | verified |
People
(Reporter: mkaply, Assigned: mkaply)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(1 file)
47 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
jcristau
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
jcristau
:
approval-mozilla-esr68+
|
Details | Review |
When we switched to the new extension install code, we moved towards using a failing URI creation to detect file paths.
This doesn't work on Windows because C:/foo/bar is a "valid" URI.
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Keywords: regression
Regressed by: 1522823
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
Pushed by mozilla@kaply.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/e7434e7979b2
Check for file paths before assuming a URL. r=aswan
Comment 4•5 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 5 years ago
status-firefox70:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 70
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9084099 [details]
Bug 1571120 - Check for file paths before assuming a URL.
Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
- User impact if declined: Using the original syntax for installing extensions via policy doesn't work. (regression)
- Is this code covered by automated tests?: Yes
- Has the fix been verified in Nightly?: No
- Needs manual test from QE?: Yes
- If yes, steps to reproduce: Create an extension install policy on Windows using a Windows path. Verify it now installs.
- List of other uplifts needed: None
- Risk to taking this patch: Low
- Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): This is a policy only change with a test.
- String changes made/needed:
ESR Uplift Approval Request
- If this is not a sec:{high,crit} bug, please state case for ESR consideration: Policy only, regression.
- User impact if declined: Using the original syntax for installing extensions via policy doesn't work. (regression)
- Fix Landed on Version: 70
- Risk to taking this patch: Low
- Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): Policy only.
- String or UUID changes made by this patch:
Attachment #9084099 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-esr68?
Attachment #9084099 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Flags: qe-verify+
Comment 6•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9084099 [details]
Bug 1571120 - Check for file paths before assuming a URL.
policy fix for 68.1esr and 69.0b16
Attachment #9084099 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-esr68?
Attachment #9084099 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-esr68+
Attachment #9084099 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #9084099 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta+
Comment 7•5 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
status-firefox-esr68:
--- → fixed
Comment 8•5 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
status-firefox69:
--- → fixed
Updated•5 years ago
|
status-firefox68:
--- → wontfix
status-firefox-esr60:
--- → unaffected
Updated•5 years ago
|
QA Whiteboard: [qa-triaged]
Comment 9•5 years ago
|
||
I have managed to reproduce this issue using Firefox 70.0a1 (BuildId:20190812095530) on Windows 10 64bit.
This issue is verified fixed using Firefox 70.0a1 (BuildId:20190826094255), Firefox 69.0b16 (BuildId:20190822210915) and Firefox 68.1.0esr (provided in comment 7) on Windows 10 64bit.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Flags: qe-verify+
Updated•3 years ago
|
Has Regression Range: --- → yes
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•