move urlClassification out of common data
Categories
(WebExtensions :: Request Handling, defect, P1)
Tracking
(firefox70 fixed)
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox70 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: mixedpuppy, Assigned: mixedpuppy)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [test-isolation-backout])
Attachments
(1 file)
Since it is privileged data, it needs to happen per extension rather than in common data which is shared.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•4 years ago
|
||
Pushed by scaraveo@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/8628b6ec7506 move urlClassification to per-extension request data r=rpl
Comment 3•4 years ago
|
||
Backed out changeset 8628b6ec7506 (bug 1576252) for multiple failures at components/extensions/test/xpcshell/test_webRequest_filtering.js
Backout: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/996ae56a62134d46e0bb460857d33af8eff8ff02
Failure logs:
mochitest: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#/jobs?job_id=263247110&repo=autoland&lineNumber=2551
xpcshell: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#/jobs?job_id=263250657&repo=autoland&lineNumber=3163
browser-chrome: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#/jobs?job_id=263247425&repo=autoland&lineNumber=16379
Pushed by scaraveo@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/558f8555b78f move urlClassification to per-extension request data r=rpl
Comment 5•4 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Comment 6•4 years ago
|
||
AIUI bug 1564594 depends on this, and wants uplift to esr68. Would you mind requesting uplift here as well?
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•4 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Julien Cristau [:jcristau] from comment #6)
AIUI bug 1564594 depends on this, and wants uplift to esr68. Would you mind requesting uplift here as well?
Are you sure you're asking on the correct bug?
This is a fix on code that landed in Fx70 in bug 1547140, I don't see how anything could depend on this and need uplift.
Comment 8•4 years ago
|
||
I was basing this on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1564594#c34 but it sounds like this doesn't actually affect esr68. Sorry for the noise.
Comment 9•4 years ago
|
||
Hello,
Will this fix require manual validation? If yes, please provide some steps to reproduce in order to correctly test it and also, please set the "qe-verify+" flag. Otherwise, could the "qe-verify-" flag be added? Thanks!
Updated•4 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•4 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Julien Cristau [:jcristau] from comment #8)
it sounds like this doesn't actually affect esr68
Ok, it wouldn't be a problem there.
Updated•4 years ago
|
Updated•4 years ago
|
Description
•