Open Bug 1586072 Opened 6 years ago Updated 21 days ago

Password Manager using Secret Service

Categories

(Toolkit :: Password Manager, enhancement, P3)

Unspecified
Linux
enhancement

Tracking

()

UNCONFIRMED

People

(Reporter: link.ted, Unassigned)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:69.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/69.0

Expected results:

It would be great if Firefox uses the Secret Service API as an additional Password Manager. The Secret Service is the API that is implemented by the Gnome Keyring and KWallet. I know there is an Add-on1 for the Gnome Keyring, but it is not compatible with the latest Firefox.

For this API Firefox or an Add-on has to communicate with the Session DBus.

Component: Untriaged → Security
OS: Unspecified → Linux

This probably supersedes bug 278343

What will happen with this bug, now?

AFAIK kwallet does not implement secret service. There was initial work on KSecretService, but it never completed.

I would like to add that KeePassXC supports this.

KDE support for Secrets Service DBus API is almost done and wait to merge.
https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kwallet/-/merge_requests/11

Severity: normal normal → S3 S3
Duplicate of this bug: 1753160
Duplicate of this bug: 278343
Duplicate of this bug: 309807
Blocks: oskeystore

For the record, the corresponding meta bug is bug 1463865

Component: Security → Password Manager
Product: Firefox → Toolkit
Version: 69 Branch → unspecified
Severity: S3 → N/A
Priority: -- → P3

Not sure if #1831957 is a duplicate, but this is highly desired feature.

#c9

martin.monperrus@gmail.com, how does that meta bug differ to this one? I can't see what a meta-bug in this context would entail (except implementing this functionality into Thunderbird, perhaps)?

#c10

timur@libreoffice.org, looks like it. Thanks. I've asked at bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1831957#c2 the author to ascertain whether it is, and if not, specify how it isn't.

Flags: needinfo?(martin.monperrus)

How does that meta bug differ to this one? I can't see what a meta-bug in this context would entail (except implementing this functionality into Thunderbird, perhaps)?

Ah, ignore that: just noticed bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1463865#a5568120_397236. Apologies.

Flags: needinfo?(martin.monperrus)
Duplicate of this bug: 1831957
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.