(In reply to Dave Hunt [:davehunt] [he/him] ⌚BST from comment #1)
I would suggest the more generic
application rather than
and also consider an
My gut feeling says we cannot support
application_version during this quarter. But will do some research to properly confirm that.
Still, if we've reached this subject... It's reasonable to assume that
application is a data decoupling factor.
But I consider
application_version to not be a data decoupling factor. After we, let's say update Chrome's version used in our CI, we should still see data points collected under the same signature. That way, we'll be able to be alerted on changes like these & label them as test harness changes.
After all, that's how we've handled updates to mitmproxy, when we've switched from 2.0.2 to 4.0.4. Bebe, hopefully I'm right here. Could you please confirm this, if you have a better memory than mine?
Dave, am I right about this assumption?