does xptcall code for Solaris x86 work right?

VERIFIED FIXED

Status

()

defect
P3
normal
VERIFIED FIXED
20 years ago
11 years ago

People

(Reporter: jband_mozilla, Assigned: shaver)

Tracking

Trunk
x86
Solaris
Points:
---

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

Attachments

(3 attachments)

I saw the posting in the patches group about using the the unixish-x86 xptcall
code for Solaris x86. Does this work right? Pass tests? etc?

It reminded me that Arthur Jones <aljones@lbl.gov> had sent me an xptcall
implementation for Solaris x86 some time back. I replied to him at the time that
it needed some changes (at least remove the printf from this low-level code).
I'm sad to admit that I forgot about this.

Are there any bits of his implementation that the Solaris x86 needs which differ
from the more generic unixish-x86 implementation? I'm not setup to test this and
don't have any useful knowledge of this platform.

I'll attach Arthur's files to this bug.
Assignee: jband → shaver
Let's dump this on shaver and see if he squirms.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
I want to do something with this bug, but I don't exactly know what.  Arthur, do
you have any thoughts on jband's questions?  If the xptcall stuff works for you,
I'm happy to check it in.
Moving all XPConnect QA contact to rginda
QA Contact: cbegle → rginda
Arthur?  Do you want this stuff to go in?
OS: Windows NT → Solaris
Now that the xptcall assembler code works for Solaris Intel compiled with
eith the Gnu compilers or the Sun native compilers, can this bug be closed out?
Concurring that xptcall is working on SolarisX86 
Keywords: verifyme
Sold!
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Verified.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Keywords: verifyme
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.