Closed Bug 1616041 Opened 2 years ago Closed 2 years ago

196.11 - 223% tp5n main_normal_fileio (windows10-64-shippable, windows10-64-shippable-qr) regression on push bd02e39a0b42472b4ebb3a84d220d0aecce1074c (Thu February 13 2020)

Categories

(Core :: XPCOM, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
Tracking Status
firefox75 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: Bebe, Unassigned)

References

(Regression)

Details

(4 keywords)

Talos has detected a Firefox performance regression from push:

https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/pushloghtml?changeset=95e06979aeba8087551851bb0b25da6de2ec055f

As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression.

Regressions:

223% tp5n main_normal_fileio windows10-64-shippable opt e10s stylo 909,433.08 -> 2,937,438.17
196% tp5n main_normal_fileio windows10-64-shippable-qr opt e10s stylo 936,182.42 -> 2,772,094.33
153% tp5n main_normal_fileio windows10-64-shippable-qr opt e10s stylo 1,109,984.50 -> 2,803,193.67

You can find links to graphs and comparison views for each of the above tests at: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=24961

On the page above you can see an alert for each affected platform as well as a link to a graph showing the history of scores for this test. There is also a link to a treeherder page showing the Talos jobs in a pushlog format.

To learn more about the regressing test(s), please see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/TestEngineering/Performance/Talos

For information on reproducing and debugging the regression, either on try or locally, see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/TestEngineering/Performance/Talos/Running

*** Please let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the offending patch(es) will be backed out! ***

Our wiki page outlines the common responses and expectations: https://wiki.mozilla.org/TestEngineering/Performance/Talos/RegressionBugsHandling

Flags: needinfo?(dothayer)
Component: Performance → XPCOM
Product: Testing → Core
Version: Version 3 → unspecified

I believe this was fixed by bug 1615045

Flags: needinfo?(dothayer)

Nathan, can you please triage this? Thank you!

Flags: needinfo?(nfroyd)
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 2 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(nfroyd)
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Resolution: WORKSFORME → FIXED
Has Regression Range: --- → yes
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.