Too many warnings: Main Thread] WARNING: Missing GtkWidget 87 , file .../mozilla/widget/gtk/WidgetStyleCache.cpp, line 763
Categories
(Core :: Widget: Gtk, defect)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox76 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: ishikawa, Assigned: stransky)
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
47 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
Details | Review | |
1.25 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
While running mochitest of C-C TB FULL DEBUG build locally , I noticed there are many warnings of the following form.
0:40.12 GECKO(146040) [146040, Main Thread] WARNING: Missing GtkWidget 87
0:40.12 GECKO(146040) : file /NEW-SSD/NREF-COMM-CENTRAL/mozilla/widget/gtk/WidgetStyleCache.cpp, line 763
There were whopping 24565 lines (!).
You can see the warnings in tryserver jobs of other people as well.: e.g.
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try-comm-central&fromchange=6c81ea172348b677edd90753b6f5b5be3afbce6a&selectedJob=292189682
linux debug run:
https://firefoxci.taskcluster-artifacts.net/FZzfXi8FScuJpukxLvuuBA/0/public/logs/live_backing.log
Code in question: WidgetStyleCache.cpp
GtkWidget* GetWidget(WidgetNodeType aAppearance) {
GtkWidget* widget = sWidgetStorage[aAppearance];
if (!widget) {
widget = CreateWidget(aAppearance);
// Some widgets (MOZ_GTK_COMBOBOX_SEPARATOR for instance) may not be
// available or implemented.
if (!widget) {
NS_WARNING(nsPrintfCString("Missing GtkWidget %d\n", aAppearance).get()); <== THIS
return nullptr;
}
I have no idea whether aAppearance == 87 is very important or not.
If it is NOT, we may special case the warning output and ignore it.
OTOH, if it is important, we may want to investigate more.
From https://searchfox.org/comm-central/source/mozilla/widget/gtk/gtkdrawing.h#142
it seems that 86 is for
86: MOZ_GTK_COMBOBOX_ARROW
87: MOZ_GTK_COMBOBOX_SEPARATOR <=== THIS
88: MOZ_GTK_COMBOBOX_ENTRY
Either we should special case the warning for MOZ_GTKCOMBOBOX_SEPARATOR and suppress it or look into this.
Wait. The comment of the code suggests the original author IS AWARE OF this
missing case of MOZ_GTK_COMBOBOX_SEPARATOR. I think we should special case this then.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•4 years ago
|
||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•4 years ago
|
||
Hi,
I noticed that the proposed patch removes the warning altogether.
OTOH, it may be prudent to print UNEXPECTED missing widgets just in case
future GTK installations are screwed up somehow across various linux distributions.
My patch here tries NOT to print warning for the special case, but
generally print it.
Just a thought. It is maintainer's call.
Pushed by csabou@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/2ae735de5134 [Wayland] Don't print 'Missing GtkWidget' warning, r=jhorak
Comment 4•4 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Description
•