Closed Bug 1622778 Opened 4 years ago Closed 2 years ago

Considering moving AlternateServices to socket process

Categories

(Core :: Networking, task, P2)

Product:
Core
Component:
Networking
Type:
task

Tracking

()

Status:
RESOLVED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: kershaw, Unassigned)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

(Whiteboard: [necko-triaged])

Our current implementation sends the necessary information to parent process for parsing AltSvc and storing the mapping. It'd be great if we can do this directly on socket process.

Blocks: [socket-process-phase2]
Priority: -- → P2
Whiteboard: [necko-triaged]

Hey [:kershaw] !
I would like to work on this.Can you elaborate this more .
Thanks :)

(In reply to Mahak from comment #1)

Hey [:kershaw] !
I would like to work on this.Can you elaborate this more .
Thanks :)

Thanks for offering the help.
But, this one is a bit complicated and I am still not sure how to do this.
I'd suggest to start with other simple bugs.

(In reply to Kershaw Chang [:kershaw] from comment #2)

(In reply to Mahak from comment #1)

Hey [:kershaw] !
I would like to work on this.Can you elaborate this more .
Thanks :)

Thanks for offering the help.
But, this one is a bit complicated and I am still not sure how to do this.
I'd suggest to start with other simple bugs.

Can you suggest some bugs to work on ?
Thanks a lot for help :)

(In reply to Mahak from comment #3)

(In reply to Kershaw Chang [:kershaw] from comment #2)

(In reply to Mahak from comment #1)

Hey [:kershaw] !
I would like to work on this.Can you elaborate this more .
Thanks :)

Thanks for offering the help.
But, this one is a bit complicated and I am still not sure how to do this.
I'd suggest to start with other simple bugs.

Can you suggest some bugs to work on ?
Thanks a lot for help :)

You could try to start with bug 1549323.
I'll explain what to do in that bug.

(In reply to Kershaw Chang [:kershaw] from comment #4)

(In reply to Mahak from comment #3)

(In reply to Kershaw Chang [:kershaw] from comment #2)

(In reply to Mahak from comment #1)

Hey [:kershaw] !
I would like to work on this.Can you elaborate this more .
Thanks :)

Thanks for offering the help.
But, this one is a bit complicated and I am still not sure how to do this.
I'd suggest to start with other simple bugs.

Can you suggest some bugs to work on ?
Thanks a lot for help :)

You could try to start with bug 1549323.
I'll explain what to do in that bug.

Thanks for this :)
I have commented under this bug .

Blocks: socket-proc
No longer blocks: [socket-process-phase2]

AlternateServices will stay in parent process, since the only consumer in socket process was TRRServiceChannel.
In bug 1739001, we created the connection info asynchronously for TRRServiceChannel.

Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 2 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.