Closed
Bug 1629927
Opened 4 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
Scroll Effect in https://www.apple.com/iphone-11-pro/ is not work properly with webrender
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: WebRender, defect)
Core
Graphics: WebRender
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 1619367
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox77 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: tetsuharu, Unassigned)
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
Environment
- macOS 10.15.4
- MBP 15 (2017 Mid), GPU is Intel HD Graphics 630.
- https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/078326f48100828dc60d2e0ca2819164b8803b7d
Step to Reproduce
- Open https://www.apple.com/iphone-11-pro/.
- I captured the screen with https://www.apple.com/ja/iphone-11-pro/, but I confirmed this is reproducible on US page.
- Scroll to "Pro camera system We’ve three‑upped ourselves".
- Continue to scroll.
Actual Result
See attached movies.
- Without WR, the appeal for 3 camera highlights their lens and other parts are into dark with animations.
- With WR, this effect is not reproducible.
- On macOS, other parts are not into dark.
Note
This is reproducible with Fenix Nightly on Android 10 with Pixel 3.
Fenix version is:
- Nightly 200408 06:01 (Build #20990610) 38.0.20200407190120, 4c77753ca
- GV: 77.0a1-20200407093520
- AS: 0.55.0
On Android 10 in my Pixel 3, the effect flashes. But this result sometimes does not reproduce.
Reporter | ||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Summary: Scroll Effect in https://www.apple.com/jp/iphone-11-pro/ is not work properly with webrender → Scroll Effect in https://www.apple.com/iphone-11-pro/ is not work properly with webrender
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•4 years ago
|
||
Comment 2•4 years ago
|
||
I can also reproduce this. It seems to be caused by the 0.15 opacity not properly applying to 'image-hardware-phone' some of the time.
It doesn't reproduce in a single filed saved version of the page.
The next best steps are probably to take a capture and see if it reproduces there.
Comment 4•4 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jeff Muizelaar [:jrmuizel] from comment #3)
Miko, could this be the same bug as bug 1619367?
I think so. At least I cannot reproduce it locally with the patch applied.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(mikokm)
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Updated•4 years ago
|
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•