Closed Bug 1632424 Opened 4 years ago Closed 4 years ago

1.83 - 5.96% perf_reftest_singletons external-string-pass.html (macosx1014-64-shippable) regression on push ce0291e3f74342d7543ad191b52f84f611012787 (Tue April 21 2020)

Categories

(Core :: XPCOM, defect)

defect

Tracking

()

RESOLVED WORKSFORME
mozilla77

People

(Reporter: alexandrui, Unassigned)

References

(Regression)

Details

(4 keywords)

Perfherder has detected a Talos performance regression from push ce0291e3f74342d7543ad191b52f84f611012787. As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression.

Regressions:

6% perf_reftest_singletons external-string-pass.html macosx1014-64-shippable opt e10s stylo 703.25 -> 745.15
2% perf_reftest_singletons external-string-pass.html macosx1014-64-shippable opt e10s stylo 714.16 -> 727.23

Details of the alert can be found in the alert summary, including links to graphs and comparisons for each of the affected tests. Please follow our guide to handling regression bugs and let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the offending patch(es) will be backed out in accordance with our regression policy.

For more information on performance sheriffing please see our FAQ.

Flags: needinfo?(jyavenard)
Component: Performance → XPCOM
Product: Testing → Core
Version: Version 3 → unspecified

must be a coincidence. There's nothing in this patch that could explain the measured behaviour.
Keeping ni? to look into it shortly.

I did a backfill on revision 06d3318904d2e to check for infra changes. Indeed this is a weird behavior.

Hi Jean-Yves, are you still looking into this one?

From the graphs it's not clear to me there's actually a regression here, I'll call this worksforme.

Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(jyavenard)
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME

The graph is pretty clear to me. I pushed to try a backout of this patch (not actually backed out). I will let you know the results. You will be able to see them here once the jobs are finished.

Flags: needinfo?(jcristau)

That seems to show no difference?

Flags: needinfo?(jcristau)

That's right.

Thanks for digging into this, it made no sense to me.

It's an infra change, most likely. I will push the last good job to try to make sure we have the correct baseline for try and autoland.

Has Regression Range: --- → yes
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.