1644262 - CCADB entries generated 2020-06-08T13:54:13Z

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Core :: Security Block-lists, Allow-lists, and other State, task)

Description

[J.C. Jones [:jcj] (he/him)]

Here are some entries: Please ensure that the entries are correct.

Comment 1

[J.C. Jones [:jcj] (he/him)]

(22, 49412CE4005CC65F841721D640A1, MKB SubCA 5) no match found in CRL:

Comment 2

[J.C. Jones [:jcj] (he/him)]

Attachment: revocations.txt

Comment 3

[J.C. Jones [:jcj] (he/him)]

Attachment: BugData.txt

Comment 4

[J.C. Jones [:jcj] (he/him)]

Worked, downloaded 1235 entries from the staging list.

Downloading intermediates to be revoked from bug # 1644262

Results:
Pending Kinto Dataset (Found): 1235
Added Entries (Expected): 28
[GOOD] Expected But Not Pending (Not Found): 0
Deleted: 0
[GOOD] Entries In Production But Lost Without Being Deleted (Missing): 0

[GOOD] The Expected file matches the change between the staged Kinto and production.
[GOOD] The Kinto dataset found at production equals the union of the expected file and the live list.
Nothing not found.
Nothing deleted.

Comment 5

[Kathleen Wilson]

Comment on attachment 9155112 [details]
BugData.txt

These are the correct entries to add to OneCRL.

Comment 6

[Kathleen Wilson]

Comment on attachment 9155110 [details]
revocations.txt

This versions of revocations.txt has the correct entries to add to OneCRL.

Comment 7

[J.C. Jones [:jcj] (he/him)]

Dana, can you cross-check, approve this batch at Kinto, and resolve this bug?

Comment 8

[Kathleen Wilson]

I have cross-checked BugData.txt with Kinto and everything matches.
And I cannot see a reason to need a TLS Canary run for this batch of changes.

I can approve at Kinto, if you would like.

Thanks!

Comment 9

[Kathleen Wilson]

Approved at Kinto.

Comment 10

[BMO Automation]

Moving bug to Core::Security Block-lists, Allow-lists, and other State.