Intermittent bugs/421885-1.xml == bugs/421885-1-ref.xml | image comparison, max difference: 65, number of differing pixels: 1024
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr78 | --- | unaffected |
firefox83 | --- | unaffected |
firefox84 | --- | wontfix |
firefox85 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: intermittent-bug-filer, Assigned: nical)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: intermittent-failure, regression, Whiteboard: [retriggered][stockwell unknown])
Attachments
(1 file)
Filed by: ncsoregi [at] mozilla.com
Parsed log: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=306072460&repo=autoland
Full log: https://firefox-ci-tc.services.mozilla.com/api/queue/v1/task/dpMlzFW2SMGVQLgKilgKKg/runs/0/artifacts/public/logs/live_backing.log
Reftest URL: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/raw-file/tip/layout/tools/reftest/reftest-analyzer.xhtml#logurl=https://firefox-ci-tc.services.mozilla.com/api/queue/v1/task/dpMlzFW2SMGVQLgKilgKKg/runs/0/artifacts/public/logs/live_backing.log&only_show_unexpected=1
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 16•4 years ago
|
||
Did the recent failures start with the push of bug 1672216 and bug 1672214? They are all with geckoview and webrender enabled.
Comment 17•4 years ago
|
||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Updated•4 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•4 years ago
|
||
I think that this is caused by the patch in bug 1672214 allowing alpha texture arrays to be resized. The unfortunately sampling will come out slightly differently depending on the size of the texture, which explains the intermittent nature of the issue. The patch in bug 1673387 fixes that.
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 22•4 years ago
|
||
There are 30 total failures in the last 7 days on
- android-hw-p2-8-0-android-aarch64-shippable-qr opt
- android-hw-p2-8-0-android-aarch64-qr opt and debug
Recent failure log: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer?job_id=321669121&repo=mozilla-central&lineNumber=8119
[task 2020-11-13T06:09:03.155Z] 06:09:03 INFO - REFTEST TEST-START | layout/reftests/bugs/421885-1.xml == layout/reftests/bugs/421885-1-ref.xml
[task 2020-11-13T06:09:03.155Z] 06:09:03 INFO - REFTEST TEST-LOAD | http://10.7.205.245:8854/tests/layout/reftests/bugs/421885-1.xml | 1147 / 2155 (53%)
[task 2020-11-13T06:09:03.155Z] 06:09:03 INFO - REFTEST TEST-LOAD | http://10.7.205.245:8854/tests/layout/reftests/bugs/421885-1-ref.xml | 1147 / 2155 (53%)
[task 2020-11-13T06:09:03.155Z] 06:09:03 INFO - REFTEST INFO | REFTEST fuzzy test (63, 1024) <= (65, 1024) <= (64, 1024)
[task 2020-11-13T06:09:03.155Z] 06:09:03 WARNING - REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | layout/reftests/bugs/421885-1.xml == layout/reftests/bugs/421885-1-ref.xml | image comparison, max difference: 65, number of differing pixels: 1024
Nicolas I see both bugs mentioned above are fixed, however this is still failing. Can you take a look?
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•4 years ago
|
||
Depends on D97132
Assignee | ||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Comment 25•4 years ago
|
||
Pushed by nsilva@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/801a132e9ae7 Adjust reftest references. r=jnicol
Comment 26•4 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Updated•4 years ago
|
Comment 27•4 years ago
|
||
The patch landed in nightly and beta is affected.
:nical, is this bug important enough to require an uplift?
If not please set status_beta
to wontfix
.
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•4 years ago
|
||
Feel free to uplift but I don't think adding some fuzziness to a reftest expectation to paper over it intermittently going over the fuzzy threshold is worth bothering to uplift.
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Description
•