Closed
Bug 164934
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Linux doesn't calc font sizes correctly
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: GFX, defect, P2)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: rods, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: testcase)
Attachments
(7 files, 2 obsolete files)
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
The font size for Linux fonts are not calculated correctly according to dbaron in Bug 153080 once the final patch there is applied. See this screen shot: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=95100&action=view Although dbaron seems to feel that the 12pt is too small, one must remember that the page is being scaled. I think the font with the problem is "medium". Look at the various fonts and how large they are compared to each other in the test http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=92430&action=view And then look at the screen hot again. The 12pt and 16px fonts look correct but the medium font looks too small.
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
This is blocking 153080 which is nsbeta1+.
Updated•22 years ago
|
OS: Windows 2000 → Linux
Updated•22 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P2
I'm not sure if this is the same issue but quite often I feel I have to increase the font size (by pressing Ctrl +) to get the view of a page that one would normally see in IE. "Normal" fonts in Mozilla seem to be smaller than in IE, 120% seems about right. Hope it'll get fixed. Thanks.
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
When I view the attachment I see: The image "http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=109458&action=view" cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. Is this expected?
Comment 7•22 years ago
|
||
I get the same error as in comment 6, so I built my own testcase. Looking at it in Mandrake Linux 9.0 KDE 3 1024x768 and 2002121708 trunk, default font set to 16px monotype-arial-iso8859-1 (which I think is arial.ttf from mswbfnts) 120 DPI, I find it difficult to distinguish from OS/2 2002121612 trunk with arial (arial.ttf from mswbfnts) 16px 1024x768 120 DPI.
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
Attachment #109458 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 9•22 years ago
|
||
Except in variety, doesn't look like a reduction to me, but more important, I'm seeing a bizarre result from the comment 8 testcase. Using trunks 2002121912 for OS/2, 2002122004 for W98, & 2002122008 for Linux, all at 1024 x 768 with prefs set to Arial 16px, Linux & OS/2 are essentially indistiguishable, with a second line that does not appear as expected from its description or lack thereof (looks like 12pt), while everything else seems to match its size description (can't say about size in pc, since I have no idea what that is). In contrast, everything except the 5ex paragraphs is displayed by W98 at 16px. Linux and OS/2 render both 5ex paragraphs the same, while W98 renders the second 5ex paragraph considerably larger. adding mkaply cc for possible comment
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
Is an argument trying to be made here that in the reduced testcase, all the fonts should appear the same size? This is simply not correct. In a default situation perhaps, but some of the units are absolute and others are relative. I guess I don't understand what the argument is here. 12 point is 12 point. And if when Mozilla displays a 12 point it is the same as say another editor on the same machine displaying 12 point, then it would be a correct 12 point. You can't use points to determine if fonts are being displayed correctly, because DPI changes the points. If have to set things to pixels and then actually measure the fonts to make sure they are using the right number of pixels...
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
Comment 12•22 years ago
|
||
3 screenshots to follow
Comment 13•22 years ago
|
||
Comment 14•22 years ago
|
||
Comment 15•22 years ago
|
||
With Linux, OS/2 & W98 all running 1024x768, 96DPI, 16px Arial default, I can see no difference in the c & d testcases across the OS's except for the last paragraph, which is larger in W98. While the 109902 text rendering of Linux and OS/2 are close match to each other, they obviously differ from W98. Which is right and which is wrong I don't know, but I should think smaller followed by larger would put you back where you started.
Comment 16•22 years ago
|
||
s/last paragraph, which is/last paragraphs, which are/
Comment 18•19 years ago
|
||
Current trunk on W98 is similar, rendering the 2nd two paragraphs the same size.
Attachment #109907 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 19•17 years ago
|
||
is this helped/fixed by bug 177805?
Updated•17 years ago
|
Assignee: pavlov → nobody
QA Contact: chrispetersen → general
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
Comment 20•10 years ago
|
||
This bug has been buried in the graveyard and has not been updated in over 5 years. It is probably safe to assume that it will never be fixed, so resolving as WONTFIX. [Mass-change filter: graveyard-wontfix-2014-09-24]
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•