With a new tab page defined, opening a new tab focuses the browser content instead of the urlbar
Categories
(Firefox :: Address Bar, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: aminomancer, Unassigned)
Details
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:80.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/80.0
Steps to reproduce:
- install a new tab page extension, e.g. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tab-notes/?src=search
- (that extension, incidentally, was broken by 79 or 80 too. notes no longer update. i actually forked this extension so if anyone has any insights on how i might update it for 80 i'd love to know)
- open a new tab with ctrl+t or by clicking the new tab button
Actual results:
- focus goes to the notes page, not the urlbar. like i said i'm using a fork that was working fine until i updated firefox to 80 so it's clearly a change to firefox
Expected results:
- focus should go to the urlbar, or there should be an about:config toggle to control this behavior. i'm convinced this is not intentional because if i uninstall the new tab page extension, focus goes to the urlbar like it used to.
Can confirm, I have the same issue. This issue was already filed under bug 1651372. May I suggest you add your vote to that one? That way we might get it fixed sooner :)
Comment 2•4 years ago
|
||
Bugbug thinks this bug should belong to this component, but please revert this change in case of error.
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•4 years ago
|
||
update: the issue i mentioned with that tab notes extension not updating is due to https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2020/07/09/changes-to-storage-sync-in-firefox-79/
it can be "fixed" by using storage.local instead of storage.sync. which is a shitty solution because that means it doesn't sync between profiles. seriously, 100KB limit? are people storing their browser profiles on gameboy cartridges or something? what use can a quota possibly serve that benefits the consumer? anyway you can at least ignore my question about that, or better yet take it as user/developer feedback rather than a bug report.
Updated•4 years ago
|
Comment 4•4 years ago
|
||
FYI: 1652165 looks like a dupe
Comment 5•4 years ago
|
||
Does it work correctly now?
it was probably bug 1596738
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•4 years ago
|
||
yeah, think i already commented on that bug
Updated•4 years ago
|
Description
•