Closed Bug 1652432 Opened 4 years ago Closed 4 years ago

3.42 - 8.31% tp5o_webext / tp5o_webext responsiveness (linux64-shippable, linux64-shippable-qr) regression on push 63b8480782c85e2365d5fa9486c32b7ab223e998 (Fri July 10 2020)

Categories

(Core :: Performance, defect)

defect

Tracking

()

RESOLVED WONTFIX
Tracking Status
firefox-esr68 --- unaffected
firefox-esr78 --- unaffected
firefox78 --- unaffected
firefox79 --- unaffected
firefox80 --- wontfix

People

(Reporter: alexandrui, Unassigned)

References

(Regression)

Details

(4 keywords)

Perfherder has detected a talos performance regression from push 63b8480782c85e2365d5fa9486c32b7ab223e998. As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression.

Regressions:

8% tp5o_webext responsiveness linux64-shippable-qr opt e10s stylo 2.26 -> 2.45
8% tp5o_webext responsiveness linux64-shippable-qr opt e10s stylo 2.28 -> 2.46
4% tp5o_webext linux64-shippable opt e10s stylo 269.70 -> 280.37
3% tp5o_webext linux64-shippable-qr opt e10s stylo 265.86 -> 274.94

Improvements:

18% tp5o_webext macosx1014-64-shippable opt e10s stylo 628.73 -> 514.00
8% tsvgr_opacity macosx1014-64-shippable opt e10s stylo 163.88 -> 150.93
6% tp5o macosx1014-64-shippable opt e10s stylo 375.38 -> 353.34

Details of the alert can be found in the alert summary, including links to graphs and comparisons for each of the affected tests. Please follow our guide to handling regression bugs and let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the offending patch(es) will be backed out in accordance with our regression policy.

For more information on performance sheriffing please see our FAQ.

Flags: needinfo?(bas)
Product: Testing → Core

Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1650629

(In reply to Alexandru Ionescu (needinfo me) [:alexandrui] from comment #0)

[...] the offending patch(es) will be backed out

So users will get 0,5-10s hangs again on opening various website pages, not good idea.

I suspect this is just the opposite of bug 1650397 :). But not all things reported yet.

Flags: needinfo?(bas)
See Also: → 1650777

[QF triage]: Bas: now that some time has passed since this was filed, do we have any more information about what the best next-action is here? (And is this a real regression, or are we just shifting some work around in a way that makes some things faster & other things slower, or something else?)

Flags: needinfo?(bas)
See Also: → 1652684

Yeah, this is just due to fixing a bug that we introduced in the initial landing of the scheduler. With that in mind, closing.

Flags: needinfo?(bas)
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Has Regression Range: --- → yes
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.