Closed Bug 1653550 Opened 4 years ago Closed 4 years ago

0.75 - 1.81% Base Content JS (linux1804-64-shippable, linux1804-64-shippable-qr, macosx1014-64-shippable, windows10-64-shippable-qr, windows7-32-shippable) regression on push 840f993400695f8c67d44b35f5f7f4b2c4bcf5fd (Wed July 15 2020)

Categories

(Testing :: Performance, defect, P3)

80 Branch
defect

Tracking

(firefox-esr68 unaffected, firefox-esr78 unaffected, firefox78 unaffected, firefox79 unaffected, firefox80 wontfix)

RESOLVED WONTFIX
Tracking Status
firefox-esr68 --- unaffected
firefox-esr78 --- unaffected
firefox78 --- unaffected
firefox79 --- unaffected
firefox80 --- wontfix

People

(Reporter: Bebe, Unassigned)

References

(Regression)

Details

(Keywords: perf, perf-alert, regression)

Perfherder has detected a awsy performance regression from push 5ab89a7196a366cbf79c7e99d40cf6b7b869fe31. As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression.

Regressions:

2% Base Content JS macosx1014-64-shippable opt 3,485,696.83 -> 3,548,873.00
1% Base Content JS windows7-32-shippable opt 2,731,551.67 -> 2,756,862.00
1% Base Content JS linux1804-64-shippable opt 3,480,115.67 -> 3,509,017.67
1% Base Content JS linux1804-64-shippable-qr opt 3,480,093.00 -> 3,508,980.33
1% Base Content JS windows10-64-shippable-qr opt 3,545,770.67 -> 3,572,493.33

Details of the alert can be found in the alert summary, including links to graphs and comparisons for each of the affected tests. Please follow our guide to handling regression bugs and let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the offending patch(es) will be backed out in accordance with our regression policy.

For more information on performance sheriffing please see our FAQ.

I can't backfill through these 3 bugs can you help determine who generated this regression?

Flags: needinfo?(mbirghan)
Flags: needinfo?(dminor)
Flags: needinfo?(avandolder)

My patch got backed out so I don't think my patch could have caused this.

Flags: needinfo?(mbirghan)

This is likely caused by my patch as it adds self-hosted JS, which has caused similar regressions in the past (i.e. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1644430).

Flags: needinfo?(avandolder)

Bug 1649311 only touched C++ code so it seems unlikely that it would have caused a Base Content JS regression.

Flags: needinfo?(dminor)
No longer regressed by: 1649311
Priority: -- → P3

Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1647796

Since this was caused by my patch, this is expected due to the additional self-hosted JS.

Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.