perma toolkit/components/search/tests/xpcshell/test_reload_engines.js | test_config_updated_engine_changes - [test_config_updated_engine_changes : 242] Should have removed the expected engine - ["engine-resourceicon","engine-same-name"] ...
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Search, defect, P5)
Tracking
(thunderbird_esr78 unaffected, thunderbird79 unaffected)
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| thunderbird_esr78 | --- | unaffected |
| thunderbird79 | --- | unaffected |
People
(Reporter: intermittent-bug-filer, Unassigned)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: intermittent-failure, Whiteboard: [fixed by bug 1654377])
Filed by: mkmelin [at] iki.fi
Parsed log: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=310264923&repo=comm-central
Full log: https://firefox-ci-tc.services.mozilla.com/api/queue/v1/task/NLDmyeqNSTu8Cg-w8hN7MA/runs/0/artifacts/public/logs/live_backing.log
Look to have started with https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=comm-central&revision=f94d1b1bef0a844f6bcf0719ae2e0466968cf660 (probably an m-c change)
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
From bug 1610293.
Don't know why the engine-rel-searchform-purpose isn't included in the removed ones. I note that it doesn't have a second appliesTo item like the other ones that it works for. Why this specific case doesn't work for Thunderbird is also a mystery. Perhaps some pref that's still missing or needs to be set. Or a pref being set too late?
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
This does look like the modernConfig pref is not set for Thunderbird for this test, but toolkit/components/search/tests/xpcshell/head_modernconfig.js should be doing that.
Could someone verify that in SearchService's init() function the modernConfig is set to true for this test?
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
browser.search.modernConfig is true for SearchService.init(), so it must be something else.
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
I just tested this and the failures here have revealed a timing issue - see bug 1654377 for the details. I'll fix it there - I filed a separate bug so you could still track the test failures here, and I could get a clear description written.
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
Fixed by bug 1654377, thx Mark!
Comment 6•6 years ago
|
||
No problem, this found a potential bug so I'm glad we caught it.
| Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Description
•