Closed
Bug 1665903
Opened 4 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
"security/test/general/test_same_site_cookies_toplevel_nav.html" calls non-existing method (typo)
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Security, defect, P1)
Core
DOM: Security
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
83 Branch
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox83 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: mbrodesser-Igalia, Assigned: ckerschb)
Details
(Whiteboard: [domsecurity-active])
Attachments
(1 file)
Assignee | ||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → ckerschb
Severity: -- → S4
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Priority: -- → P1
Whiteboard: [domsecurity-active]
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•4 years ago
|
||
Pushed by btara@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/e00cc5ee99d4 Fix typo in test_same_site_cookies_toplevel_nav. r=freddyb
Comment 3•4 years ago
|
||
So there was a typo along the lines of window.addEventListner
(missing e
) and this patch is fixing this.
Mark, how hard would it be to use our webidl definitions to warn about uses of window
or document
properties that aren't in the webidl files?
Flags: needinfo?(standard8)
Comment 4•4 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago
status-firefox83:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → 83 Branch
Comment 5•4 years ago
|
||
(In reply to :Gijs (he/him) from comment #3)
So there was a typo along the lines of
window.addEventListner
(missinge
) and this patch is fixing this.Mark, how hard would it be to use our webidl definitions to warn about uses of
window
ordocument
properties that aren't in the webidl files?
Feels like it might be possible, not sure how hard as we'd probably want something for processing the webidl files to give us that information if there isn't something already.
Flags: needinfo?(standard8)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•