167173 - Duplicate message - "move to" filter with preference set to "mark messages as deleted"

Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE

(MailNews Core :: Filters, defect)

Description

[John Hernandez]

With preference set to "mark messages as deleted", plus a filter that
automatically moves incoming messages to a predetermined mailbox based on To or
CC:, I get a duplicate copy of the message in INBOX (marked as deleted).

The expected result is that the moved message ONLY appears in the destination
mailbox, without a deleted reference in INBOX.

Mozilla 1.1  Linux x86

Comment 1

[John Hernandez]

Mozilla 1.1 On WinXP exhibits the same behavior.  If a message is moved, it gets
marked as "deleted" in the original mailbox.  A "move" operation should not be
considered a delete.  For example, when the delete behavior is "move to Trash",
I don't get a copy in Trash on move operations.

Comment 2

[Kaj Kandler]

I experience this bug under Win 98 SE.

Here is my description: 
The following filter (on th eprimary mail account) does duplicate the message in
the inbox and additionaly copies it in to the desgnated folder (so effectivly
tripple the message):

version="8"
logging="yes"
name="Razor SPAM"
enabled="yes"
type="1"
action="Move to folder"
actionValue="mailbox://[e-mail]/Razor-SPAM"
condition="OR (\"X-Razor2-Warning\",contains,SPAM)"

Remarkably the following similar filter-set (on a secondary, non default, mail
account) does work correctly:

version="8"
logging="yes"
name="Ex-Skyva"
enabled="yes"
type="1"
action="Move to folder"
actionValue="mailbox://nobody@Local%20Folders/Ex-skyva-Employees"
condition="OR (from,contains,ex-skyva-employees)"
name="Razor SPAM"
enabled="yes"
type="1"
action="Move to folder"
actionValue="mailbox://KajKandler@localhost/Razor-SPAM"
condition="OR (\"X-Razor2-Warning\",contains,SPAM)"

Hope you can fix this soon. It's quite annoying.

Comment 3

[Mike Cowperthwaite]

I searched for an earlier duplicate of this message and could not find it, so 
clearing the "DUPEME" from the whiteboard.

John Hernandez, Kaj Kandler: am I correct in assuming that you see this problem 
using IMAP mail, rather than POP?

Comment 4

[Christian Hamacher]

Quite similar bugs, possibly dupes: 193325, 196066, 176691 - see additional
comments there.
	

Comment 5

[Kaj Kandler]

(In reply to comment #3) 
> I searched for an earlier duplicate of this message and could not find it, so  
> clearing the "DUPEME" from the whiteboard. 
>  
> John Hernandez, Kaj Kandler: am I correct in assuming that you see this 
problem  
> using IMAP mail, rather than POP? 
Sorry for my laziness, 
I missed that message in my inbox. 
Yes I'm using IMAP and POP interchangeably. 
K<o> 
 
 

Comment 6

[Kaj Kandler]

(In reply to comment #3) 
> I searched for an earlier duplicate of this message and could not find it, so  
> clearing the "DUPEME" from the whiteboard. 
>  
> John Hernandez, Kaj Kandler: am I correct in assuming that you see this 
problem  
> using IMAP mail, rather than POP? 
Sorry for my laziness, 
I missed that message in my inbox. 
Yes I'm using IMAP and POP interchangeably. 
K<o> 
 
 

Comment 7

[Wayne Mery (:wsmwk)]

(In reply to comment #4)
> Quite similar bugs, possibly dupes: 193325, 196066, 176691 - see additional
> comments there.

I see this with imap with a filter of "move to trash". Thunderbird v2

Comment 8

[Wayne Mery (:wsmwk)]

> > Quite similar bugs, possibly dupes: bug 193325, bug 196066, bug 176691 

Comment 9

[AlexRayne]

TB v3.0 works same - it copyes letters marked as deleted

Comment 11

[Wayne Mery (:wsmwk)]

(In reply to AlexRayne from comment #9)
> TB v3.0 works same - it copyes letters marked as deleted

what settings were you using?
and do you still see this problem?


(In reply to Wayne Mery (:wsmwk) from comment #8)
> > > Quite similar bugs, possibly dupes: bug 193325, bug 196066,

tjese two were duped to bug 381588

Comment 12

[Joshua Cranmer [:jcranmer]]

RESOLVED INCOMPLETE due to lack of response to previous question. If you feel this change has been made in error, please respond to this bug with your reason why.