Closed
Bug 167714
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
Javascript from a secure site (https) should be considered signed.
Categories
(Core :: Security, defect)
Core
Security
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: jesse.houwing, Assigned: security-bugs)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020829
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020829
Judging from the documentation found at:
http://developer.netscape.com/docs/manuals/communicator/jsguide4/sec.htm
scripts coming from a secure website should be considered signed by the
certificate of the website. This was the case in NS4, but is no longer the case
in Mozilla.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
vcb
Actual Results:
fdg
Expected Results:
fdg
dfgfdg
| Reporter | ||
Updated•23 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Summary: Javascript from a secure site (Hhttps) should be considered signed. → Javascript from a secure site (https) should be considered signed.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
sorry for the garble, bugzilla doesn't show a "finalize" form anymore... :(
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
This prevents me from using:
netscape.security.PrivilegeManager.enablePrivilege("UniversalBrowserRead");
from an unsigned script.
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
Browser, not engine ---> Security:General
Assignee: rogerl → mstoltz
Component: JavaScript Engine → Security: General
QA Contact: pschwartau → bsharma
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
That feature was removed as of version 6.0. I have proposed bringing it back,
but the crypto engineers think it isn't safe. I'm not convinced of that,
although to do this would be to use SSL (https) in a way it was not designed to
be used. There's still a possibility of doing this at some point, but it won't
be soon. For now, scripts must be signed (or run from the local drive) in order
to enable privileges.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
| Reporter | ||
Comment 5•23 years ago
|
||
What makes it different from signed javascript? It shows a certificate in both
cases, and in both cases the user will have to approve the request. Where is the
catch I'm missing :)
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•