Closed Bug 167714 Opened 23 years ago Closed 23 years ago

Javascript from a secure site (https) should be considered signed.

Categories

(Core :: Security, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 91067

People

(Reporter: jesse.houwing, Assigned: security-bugs)

Details

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020829 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020829 Judging from the documentation found at: http://developer.netscape.com/docs/manuals/communicator/jsguide4/sec.htm scripts coming from a secure website should be considered signed by the certificate of the website. This was the case in NS4, but is no longer the case in Mozilla. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. vcb Actual Results: fdg Expected Results: fdg dfgfdg
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Summary: Javascript from a secure site (Hhttps) should be considered signed. → Javascript from a secure site (https) should be considered signed.
sorry for the garble, bugzilla doesn't show a "finalize" form anymore... :(
This prevents me from using: netscape.security.PrivilegeManager.enablePrivilege("UniversalBrowserRead"); from an unsigned script.
Browser, not engine ---> Security:General
Assignee: rogerl → mstoltz
Component: JavaScript Engine → Security: General
QA Contact: pschwartau → bsharma
That feature was removed as of version 6.0. I have proposed bringing it back, but the crypto engineers think it isn't safe. I'm not convinced of that, although to do this would be to use SSL (https) in a way it was not designed to be used. There's still a possibility of doing this at some point, but it won't be soon. For now, scripts must be signed (or run from the local drive) in order to enable privileges.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
What makes it different from signed javascript? It shows a certificate in both cases, and in both cases the user will have to approve the request. Where is the catch I'm missing :)
Dupe of bug 91067 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 91067 ***
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.