Closed Bug 1685285 Opened 4 years ago Closed 2 years ago

Categories

(Release Engineering :: Release Automation, defect, P5)

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: intermittent-bug-filer, Unassigned)

Details

(Keywords: intermittent-failure)

Filed by: archaeopteryx [at] coole-files.de
Parsed log: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer?job_id=325960939&repo=try
Full log: https://firefox-ci-tc.services.mozilla.com/api/queue/v1/task/MSpCJOvaTMCInQX70oELWw/runs/0/artifacts/public/logs/live_backing.log


[task 2021-01-06T09:57:03.287Z] calling QuitProgressUI
[task 2021-01-06T09:57:04.427Z] Comparing source/firefox with target/firefox...
[task 2021-01-06T09:57:04.427Z] No differences found
[task 2021-01-06T09:57:04.427Z] Using  https://stage.balrog.nonprod.cloudops.mozgcp.net/update/3/Firefox/85.0/20201214185926/Linux_x86_64-gcc3/en-CA/beta-localtest/default/default/default/update.xml?force=1
[task 2021-01-06T09:57:04.429Z] Retrieving 'https://stage.balrog.nonprod.cloudops.mozgcp.net/update/3/Firefox/85.0/20201214185926/Linux_x86_64-gcc3/en-CA/beta-localtest/default/default/default/update.xml?force=1' from cache...
[task 2021-01-06T09:57:04.433Z] Got this response:
[task 2021-01-06T09:57:04.433Z] <?xml version="1.0"?>
[task 2021-01-06T09:57:04.433Z] <updates>
[task 2021-01-06T09:57:04.433Z]     <update actions="showURL" appVersion="86.0" buildID="20210105105446" detailsURL="https://www.mozilla.org/en-CA/firefox/86.0/releasenotes/" displayVersion="86.0 Beta 1" openURL="https://www.mozilla.org/en-CA/firefox/86.0beta/whatsnew/?oldversion=%OLD_VERSION%" type="minor">
[task 2021-01-06T09:57:04.433Z]         <patch type="complete" URL="https://ftp.stage.mozaws.net/pub/firefox/candidates/86.0b1-candidates/build1/update/linux-x86_64/en-CA/firefox-86.0b1.complete.mar" hashFunction="sha512" hashValue="6f8ffed3c95c5911190da1e4926d401668318adbd7c5f4753b8d2baefcea12d39b1ffddc781dc9ea0d1a89a1bc3d5d6e21203119387146cdb00277bcac9e4daf" size="60400461"/>
[task 2021-01-06T09:57:04.433Z]     </update>
[task 2021-01-06T09:57:04.435Z] </updates>
[task 2021-01-06T09:57:04.435Z] 
[task 2021-01-06T09:57:04.440Z] TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL: no partial update found for https://stage.balrog.nonprod.cloudops.mozgcp.net/update/3/Firefox/85.0/20201214185926/Linux_x86_64-gcc3/en-CA/beta-localtest/default/default/default/update.xml?force=1
[task 2021-01-06T09:57:04.440Z] TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL: [85.0 en-CA partial] download_mars returned non-zero exit code: 1```

Ben, your 85.0b1 staging release on Monday didn't encounter the issue. Any idea what's wrong with this 86.0b1 staging release?

Flags: needinfo?(bhearsum)

(In reply to Sebastian Hengst [:aryx] (needinfo on intermittent or backout) from comment #1)

Ben, your 85.0b1 staging release on Monday didn't encounter the issue. Any idea what's wrong with this 86.0b1 staging release?

The buildid being used there doesn't match the one in staging balrog. 85.0b1 en-CA in staging has:

      "en-CA": {
          "appVersion": "85.0",
          "buildID": "20201126101736",

My release used a different set of partials, which is why I didn't hit it.

Flags: needinfo?(bhearsum)

Geoff, this has appeared once again, could you please take a look at what might've changed?

Flags: needinfo?(gbrown)

That got triggered because I had manually requested the release graph for yesterday's central-as-beta simulations.

Flags: needinfo?(gbrown)
Whiteboard: [stockwell disable-recommended]
Assignee: nobody → gbrown
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 3 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME

This is a permanent failure for release graphs added to central-as-beta simulations. Can this be resolved or the testing setup be modified to suppress this?

Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Flags: needinfo?(jcristau)
Resolution: WORKSFORME → ---
Assignee: gbrown → nobody

The easiest might be to turn off partials for these graphs (when submitting the release from shipit staging). Would that be acceptable?

We'd lose a bit of coverage for partials generation and downstream tasks, but we know the automatic selection of partials in stage is not reliable, so if we don't want failing UV tasks then no partials might be an ok tradeoff.

Flags: needinfo?(jcristau) → needinfo?(aryx.bugmail)
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 3 years ago2 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(aryx.bugmail)
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Component: Release Automation: Updates → Release Automation
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.