A child node with overflow:auto should take 100% of available remaining width of its parent node. This is no longer the case with 2002092408 using XP Pro SP1. A test case is coming.
I forgot to mention to go to the given url, try any of the 3 demos and you'll see in the content (bottom) div an extra unused area at the right side which I suspect correspond to the width of a vertical scrollbar.
Created attachment 100498 [details] Self auto-explanatory reduced test case There is an unused area at the right hand side of the content area div in this demo.
I'm quite confused. I don't see what the bug is here. Which DIV is the "content area div"?
Oh, I was using an old build. Now I see the bug.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Could it be possible to insert the keyword "regression" into this bugfile? In a sense, Robert O'C. and I confirm that this is a regression. I'm quite sure this regression is recent since I downloaded many nightly builds in the last 20 days and I just noticed this layout problem today.
The regresssion was caused by my checkin for bug 169610.
I think we should backout the change until I can figure out a better fix.
Comment on attachment 100538 [details] [diff] [review] backout the change r=karnaze
Attachment #100538 - Flags: review+
Comment on attachment 100538 [details] [diff] [review] backout the change email@example.com
Attachment #100538 - Flags: superreview+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.