Closed Bug 1706369 Opened 3 years ago Closed 3 years ago

Move nimbus manifest to its own file

Categories

(Firefox :: Nimbus Desktop Client, enhancement, P1)

enhancement

Tracking

()

VERIFIED FIXED
90 Branch
Tracking Status
firefox89 --- verified
firefox90 --- verified

People

(Reporter: k88hudson, Assigned: k88hudson)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

We should move the nimbus manifest for Desktop to its own file so it can be picked up by Experimenter

Pushed by khudson@mozilla.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/f67e31e5000b
Move nimbus manifest to its own file r=andreio
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 3 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → 90 Branch
Blocks: 1698204

Comment on attachment 9217171 [details]
Bug 1706369 - Move nimbus manifest to its own file

Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request

  1. Change browser.proton.enabled to false
  2. Load about:welcome
  3. Ensure that the old non-proton experience shows up
  • List of other uplifts needed: None
  • Risk to taking this patch: Low
  • Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): This is a small refactor that moves some configuration to a separate file.
  • String changes made/needed:
Attachment #9217171 - Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Flags: qe-verify+
QA Whiteboard: [qa-triaged]

Comment on attachment 9217171 [details]
Bug 1706369 - Move nimbus manifest to its own file

Low risk, has tests and baked on beta, approved for 89 beta 9, thanks.

Attachment #9217171 - Flags: approval-mozilla-beta? → approval-mozilla-beta+

I managed to verify the issue on 90.0a1 (2021-05-05) and the pref flip is working as expected.
Tests were performed under Windows 10x64, Ubuntu 20.04x64 and under macOS 10.15.
I noticed that on Firefox 89.0b8 the pref flip is working too, but from Comment 6 it seems that this build should be affected. Kate, is this expected?
Note that I verified the issue by following the steps from Comment 4.

Flags: needinfo?(khudson)

Yes, this is expected – to clarify, the functionality should be unchanged for users, the test steps were to verify that no regression has occurred. Thanks!

Flags: needinfo?(khudson)

Thanks for the clarification, Kate.
It seems that everything looks good on Firefox 90.0a1 (2021-05-05) and on Firefox 89.0b9.
Tests were performed under Windows 10x64, macOS 10.15 and under Ubuntu 20.04x64.0

Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Flags: qe-verify+
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: