Closed Bug 1716543 Opened 3 years ago Closed 3 years ago

Annotate nsStandardURL::SanityCheck crash reports

Categories

(Core :: Networking: HTTP, task, P2)

task

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
91 Branch
Tracking Status
firefox90 --- fixed
firefox91 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: valentin, Assigned: valentin)

Details

(Whiteboard: [necko-triaged])

Attachments

(2 files)

No description provided.
Pushed by valentin.gosu@gmail.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/0da59114555d
Annotate nsStandardURL::SanityCheck with URL offsets r=necko-reviewers,kershaw

Shouldn't this get data review?

Thanks for the heads-up. This is my first time adding an annotation.

Attachment #9227668 - Flags: data-review?(jcristau)
Attachment #9227668 - Flags: data-review?(jcristau) → data-review?(chutten)
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 3 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → 91 Branch

Comment on attachment 9227668 [details]
crashannotation_URLSegments_datarequest.md

DATA COLLECTION REVIEW RESPONSE:

Is there or will there be documentation that describes the schema for the ultimate data set available publicly, complete and accurate?

Yes.

Is there a control mechanism that allows the user to turn the data collection on and off?

Yes. This collection is Telemetry so can be controlled through Firefox's Preferences.

If the request is for permanent data collection, is there someone who will monitor the data over time?

Yes, Valentin Gosu is responsible.

Using the category system of data types on the Mozilla wiki, what collection type of data do the requested measurements fall under?

Category 1, Technical.

Is the data collection request for default-on or default-off?

Default on for all channels.

Does the instrumentation include the addition of any new identifiers?

No.

Is the data collection covered by the existing Firefox privacy notice?

Yes.

Does the data collection use a third-party collection tool?

No.


Result: datareview+

Attachment #9227668 - Flags: data-review?(chutten) → data-review+

Comment on attachment 9227164 [details]
Bug 1716543 - Annotate nsStandardURL::SanityCheck with URL offsets r=#necko

Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request

  • User impact if declined: Lack of visibility into reason for nsStandardURL sanity check assertions (bug 1715960)
  • Is this code covered by automated tests?: Yes
  • Has the fix been verified in Nightly?: No
  • Needs manual test from QE?: No
  • If yes, steps to reproduce:
  • List of other uplifts needed: None
  • Risk to taking this patch: Low
  • Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): This code path already crashes (intentionally). This patch merely adds relevant offsets to the crash annotations.
  • String changes made/needed:
Attachment #9227164 - Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?

Comment on attachment 9227164 [details]
Bug 1716543 - Annotate nsStandardURL::SanityCheck with URL offsets r=#necko

approved for 90.0b11

Attachment #9227164 - Flags: approval-mozilla-beta? → approval-mozilla-beta+
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: