19.61 - 11.64% damp custom.inspector.reload.DAMP / damp custom.inspector.reload.DAMP + 6 more (Linux, OSX, Windows) regression on Mon October 11 2021
Categories
(DevTools :: General, defect)
Tracking
(firefox-esr78 unaffected, firefox-esr91 unaffected, firefox93 unaffected, firefox94 unaffected, firefox95 wontfix, firefox96 wontfix, firefox97 wontfix)
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr78 | --- | unaffected |
firefox-esr91 | --- | unaffected |
firefox93 | --- | unaffected |
firefox94 | --- | unaffected |
firefox95 | --- | wontfix |
firefox96 | --- | wontfix |
firefox97 | --- | wontfix |
People
(Reporter: jdescottes, Unassigned)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: perf, perf-alert, regression)
Perfherder has detected a devtools performance regression from push 5cc276dd61cc430ee317ae2c9c83b02497496935. As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression.
Regressions:
Ratio | Test | Platform | Options | Absolute values (old vs new) |
---|---|---|---|---|
20% | damp custom.inspector.reload.DAMP | macosx1015-64-shippable-qr | e10s stylo webrender-sw | 485.96 -> 581.25 |
20% | damp custom.inspector.reload.DAMP | macosx1015-64-shippable-qr | e10s stylo webrender | 485.76 -> 580.83 |
16% | damp custom.inspector.reload.DAMP | windows10-64-shippable-qr | e10s stylo webrender-sw | 564.40 -> 656.90 |
16% | damp custom.inspector.reload.DAMP | windows10-64-shippable-qr | e10s stylo webrender | 563.72 -> 653.49 |
15% | damp custom.inspector.reload.DAMP | windows10-64-shippable-qr | e10s fission stylo webrender | 541.10 -> 624.17 |
12% | damp custom.inspector.reload.DAMP | linux1804-64-shippable-qr | e10s fission stylo webrender | 614.40 -> 690.70 |
12% | damp custom.inspector.reload.DAMP | linux1804-64-shippable-qr | e10s stylo webrender-sw | 603.09 -> 673.42 |
12% | damp custom.inspector.reload.DAMP | linux1804-64-shippable-qr | e10s stylo webrender | 611.29 -> 682.45 |
Details of the alert can be found in the alert summary, including links to graphs and comparisons for each of the affected tests. Please follow our guide to handling regression bugs and let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the offending patch(es) will be backed out in accordance with our regression policy.
For more information on performance sheriffing please see our FAQ.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•3 years ago
|
||
Could be a regression from one of the Promise.jsm cleanups? Eg Bug 1734786 or Bug 1734592
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•3 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•3 years ago
|
||
I confirm the regression comes from the push containing the Promise.jsm changes: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/jobs?repo=autoland&revision=32a3cf57dd4396e123ebbba2f894e540528d0781
Setting regressed by Bug 1734786, but it might also be 1734592.
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 4•3 years ago
|
||
Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1734786
Reporter | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 5•3 years ago
|
||
Nicolas, this regression is caused by the Promise.jsm usage removal
Do we want to do something or close?
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•3 years ago
|
||
Wontfixing for 96, we can investigate that for 97.
Updated•3 years ago
|
this fell off my radar, not sure if this is still actionable now
Description
•