Closed Bug 1740203 Opened 4 years ago Closed 4 years ago

Crash in [@ RtlpHpLfhSubsegmentFreeBlock | RtlpFreeHeapInternal | RtlpHpFreeWithExceptionProtection | RtlFreeHeap | free_base | std::_Tree_val<T>::_Erase_tree<T>]

Categories

(Firefox :: Installer, defect)

Desktop
Windows 11
defect

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
96 Branch
Tracking Status
firefox-esr91 --- unaffected
firefox94 --- unaffected
firefox95 --- fixed
firefox96 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: csasca, Assigned: Jamie)

References

Details

(Keywords: crash)

Crash Data

Crash report: https://crash-stats.mozilla.org/report/index/3d1114ca-5b45-4e6b-9565-6dad50211109

Reason: STATUS_HEAP_CORRUPTION

Top 10 frames of crashing thread:

0 ntdll.dll RtlReportFatalFailure 
1 ntdll.dll RtlReportCriticalFailure 
2 ntdll.dll RtlpHeapHandleError 
3 ntdll.dll RtlpHpHeapHandleError 
4 ntdll.dll RtlpLogHeapFailure 
5 ntdll.dll RtlpHpLfhSubsegmentFreeBlock 
6 ntdll.dll RtlpFreeHeapInternal 
7 ntdll.dll RtlpHpFreeWithExceptionProtection 
8 ntdll.dll RtlFreeHeap 
9 nvdahelperremote.dll free_base minkernel\crts\ucrt\src\appcrt\heap\free_base.cpp:105

[Platforms Affected]

  • Windows 11

[Builds Affected]

  • Firefox 95.0b5
  • Firefox 96.0a1 (no crashes occurred only some hangs ~2 seconds)

[Steps to Reproduce]

  • See the steps from Bug 1736742 (crash occurred while verifying the fixed builds on the wikipedia page)

[Notes]

  • Here is an attachment with the hangs, and where this crash occurs aswell (not caught in the gif).
  • Feel free to change the component to the right one
  • Seems that Firefox 96.0a1 is much more stable than 95.0b5
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED

Reopening based on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1736742#c37 - this is going to affect 96 when it rides to Beta also.

Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---

(In reply to Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM] from comment #3)

Reopening based on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1736742#c37 - this is going to affect 96 when it rides to Beta also.

That bug has now been re-fixed, and verified for 96. Should we close this again?

Flags: needinfo?(ryanvm)

Yes indeed!

Assignee: nobody → jteh
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago4 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(ryanvm)
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → 96 Branch
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.