Users are not able to open WhatsApp Web in Private WIndow
Categories
(Firefox :: Untriaged, defect)
Tracking
()
| Webcompat Priority | ? |
People
(Reporter: abhinavsecondary, Unassigned)
Details
Firefox for Android
Steps to reproduce:
Steps to reproduce:--
- Open Firefox private window
- Go to web.whatsapp.com
- You will notice that page is continuously generating a request on https://web.whatsapp.com/?logout_reason=0 and unable to get the page that is required for login on WhatsApp web
I have verified this same behavior on Linux, Windows and on mobile also.
Impact:--
As you know Meta has largest social media users base and WhatsApp is a part of it.
Many users use private tab to login there WhatsApp when they are accessing there chats on somebodies else PC to maintain there privacy that if they directly close the private window then nobody can access there chats even if they didn't logout.
Due to this bug user are unable to access the login page of WhatsApp in a private window and this can create a wrong impression against Firefox in users mind and give an advantage to other browser to attract users to use there browser instead of Firefox
Actual results:
Web page continuously try to reload itself.
Expected results:
It should be get user to a web page where user are able to scan the QR code and able to access there messages
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•3 years ago
|
||
I have found this issue in all Firefox(Linux/Windows/Android). So can you kindly change the device to all not only with just android.
And I forget to attach POC video.
Here is the POC video link -- https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yz4VRiNhxMOoWfsN7AYApI7Wr0Dp1fVp/view?usp=sharing
Thanks and Regards
Abhinav
Comment 2•3 years ago
|
||
This isn't really a security issue with Firefox itself, so I'm going to unhide this so that more people can see this to increase the chance that it is addressed.
Comment 3•3 years ago
|
||
I saw the same loop as described in comment 0, so I'm confirming this.
| Comment hidden (obsolete) |
Updated•3 years ago
|
| Reporter | ||
Comment 5•3 years ago
|
||
But It need to be fixed as it is valid issue?
Comment 6•3 years ago
|
||
I believe this is a duplicate of Bug 1767407.
Description
•