Add support for pager, fax, mobile, ... types for vCard telephone numbers in the edit UI
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Address Book, enhancement)
Tracking
(thunderbird_esr102 verified, thunderbird102 affected)
People
(Reporter: TbSync, Assigned: darktrojan)
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
19.08 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
wsmwk
:
approval-comm-esr102+
|
Details | Review |
The edit UI only has "Home", "Work" and "None" in the dropdown type selector, but the overview UI correctly displays the additional type info.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•2 years ago
|
||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Pushed by geoff@darktrojan.net:
https://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/3b73aa35ddad
Add mobile, fax and pager types to Address Book card editor. r=#thunderbird-reviewers,aleca
Assignee | ||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•2 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9282305 [details]
Bug 1774765 - Add mobile, fax and pager types to Address Book card editor. r=#thunderbird-reviewers
[Approval Request Comment]
Regression caused by (bug #): new Address Book
User impact if declined: can't make a phone number marked as mobile or fax
Testing completed (on c-c, etc.): landed last week
Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): no
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•2 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9282305 [details]
Bug 1774765 - Add mobile, fax and pager types to Address Book card editor. r=#thunderbird-reviewers
Wrong flag.
Comment 5•2 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9282305 [details]
Bug 1774765 - Add mobile, fax and pager types to Address Book card editor. r=#thunderbird-reviewers
[Triage Comment]
Approved for esr102
Let's explicitly QA/test address book in RC2, to make sure there are no regressions or ill effects
Comment 6•2 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
Thunderbird 102.0:
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-esr102/rev/63719672a977
Comment 7•2 years ago
|
||
Verified testing the 102.0 rc and release on Windows and Fedora Linux
Comment 8•2 years ago
•
|
||
I have continuously tested the new AB before and after release and filed bugs against it.
Tried a fully filled contact card from TB 91 today and updated that to TB 102. Quite time-consuming...
- pager, fax, mobile etc. all migrated perfectly (this bug 1774765, VERIFIED FIXED)
More findings:
- web addresses without protocol like http:// not shown in display - odd. Also blocks saving other edits like name to the card - worse.
- Filed Bug 1779567 - Reversed order of primary street address and extended address after update to 102
- Birthday of 29 Feb (without year, from TB91) displays as 1 March. Also blocks saving other edits. Bug 1779100 territory.
Tested and same result for 102.0.2 (64-bit) and 104.0a1 (2022-07-13) (64-bit), Win10.
Description
•